True inequality begins when
you are made to believe in your own weakness —
and you accept it as the norm,
having lost the strength of spirit and the responsibility
to be Human.
Sometimes you just want to talk — not to argue, not to prove anything, not to lecture, but to say out loud what has long been living inside you; this article is exactly that kind of conversation. What if everything you were taught about the difference between men and women is a lie — not an obvious one, rather a carefully embedded one, woven into upbringing, traditions, science, culture, and language, a lie from which something resembling truth was gradually molded? From early childhood, WE ARE GIVEN ready-made answers to questions we never even get the chance to ask: who is stronger, who is more important, who must, who has the right, who is obligated? We live in a world where role matters more than essence, where behavior matters more than understanding, where the substitution of meaning has become the foundation of everyday life, family, and the very way we look at a human being. We were taught that a man must and a woman deserves; that a woman is weak because she is admired, and a man is strong because everything is placed on his shoulders; that a man thinks and a woman feels; that we are so different that equality can only be spoken of out of pity. And yet — this is the core deception. For it is precisely at the moment when you are told that you are not obliged to be strong, rational, and honest that real weakness begins — and when you agree to that, INEQUALITY BEGINS.
I decided to write this article on the eve of the New Year 2026 — as a form of respect for women, as an invitation to reflection, and perhaps even to reconciliation. And I hope women WILL NOT beat me for it — too hard. This is an attempt to turn inside out the false fabric of familiar answers and reach the essence: why the human being has ceased to be Human, hiding behind gender, habits, myths, and social masks. And it is also a chance to see that inequality lies not between man and woman, rather between who we could be — and WHO WE ALLOW ourselves to remain. I truly hope that with the new year we will step a little closer not to each other, rather to ourselves. For it is precisely there that equality begins.
The question of the difference between man and woman is being raised more and more often, as if humanity is once again returning to a search for the primal foundations of its own structure, trying to grasp in anatomy or in behavior an answer to a much deeper question: “What is a Human Being?” Over the past centuries, so much has been written on this subject that from the volume of these texts one could build NOT ONLY a house for a young couple, but an entire city, surrounded by walls of hypotheses — and yet the essence remains unclear, because the search was not conducted where the truth is hidden.
The most popular theory holds that man is an experiment, while woman is a keeper. Man creates, tests, fails, and tries again; woman preserves, filters, and reproduces. From this, a step is made toward social roles: men are innovators, women are guardians of order. Men are inclined toward searching, women toward bringing what is found to perfection. However, if one abstracts from psychological clichés and cultural stereotypes, a disturbing oddity emerges: these differences seem DELIBERATELY EXAGGERATED, as if they were consciously driven into the awareness of humanity.
And indeed — far too much in these “differences” turns out to be imposed. Gender behavior is programmed from childhood: girls — dolls, care, crying, neatness; boys — weapons, boldness, emotional suppression. 
Hundreds of years of transmitted roles form the “naturalness” of differences that are in fact imposed — not by biology, but by the STRUCTURE OF UPBRINGING, by social templates, and (most importantly) by the deep-seated system of control over humanity. And here begins a conversation not about genes and not even about culture, rather about those Forces that stood behind the interference in the civilizational course of human development. The interventionist System, known as the EBR, did not merely adjust the vectors of development — it RADICALLY CHANGED the controlling influence on all processes that took place on Earth. Including the structure of gender, the functions of the brain, and the typification of roles that man and woman play in this spectacle — called substituted reality.
Through systemic interference, a false structure of Mind and Consciousness was imposed, reduced to obedient execution rather than creative existence. Core functions were distorted to the level of rigidly imposed programming: the human being became a biorobot, gender — a matrix of subjugation, and differences — a tool of division. This is the root of that PHANTOM DIFFERENCE between man and woman, which has been debated for centuries yet never exhausted, because what is being discussed are not the causes, they are merely the effects. However, everything has changed. On 24 April 2011, something occurred that forever broke the architecture of interventionist control. The shift in Systemic power launched a process — long, and irreversible: the fog is lifting. Consciousness is beginning to regain its lost ability to distinguish Truth from the imposed. More and more people are sensing that something is wrong in the world — not in politics, not in economics, rather at the very foundation of existence.
To move forward, one must understand how the trap was constructed. Only then can an exit be found. Including an exit from the deeply rooted illusion of the “male” and the “female” as TWO DIFFERENT types of humanity. Men and women are not opposites; they are reflections of one distorted construction. Awareness of this is a step toward healing. And therefore — toward the restoration of the Whole Human. Not a half. Not a social role. Rather the Essence, capable of overcoming that which was the very goal of all interventions — the destruction of the Human as a bearer of Reason. And at this point, the difference between “men are from Mars, and women are from Venus” loses its meaning. Because the Question arrives — who are we? And who can we become if we once again remember who we were? And who we are meant to be?
For most people on Earth today, one key question arises, though not yet fully realized: will THEY BE INTEGRATED into the real future? Will each person be able to preserve the right to life in this rapidly changing world, and if so — through what trials, with the help of what efforts, will they be able not merely to survive, but to gain active participation in the re-creation of the Human and the creation of a new Humanity? This is not the whim of fantasists and not the pathos of mystics — it is the inner whisper of millions, which will soon become the VOICE OF A NEW public consciousness.
For now, this question sounds within the intimate silence of personal reflection. It lives as a hidden anxiety, as an inner mystery not brought into the light. Yet this is — not for long. Events are approaching that have already begun to unfold within the information fields and the collective psyche, and they will push what has been silenced to the surface. That which only yesterday seemed inappropriate, marginal, or “outside the agenda” will tomorrow become the CENTRAL THEME of global dialogue. The transition to a new type of Consciousness, no matter how much it is denied or mocked, has already begun, and institutional or propagandistic barriers WILL NOT STOP it. And this transition, paradoxical as it may sound, begins with what seems most familiar — with the differences between man and woman. Those very distinctions that began to be actively implanted into humanity eighteen thousand years ago, as part of a general interventionist scenario, today demand CAREFUL REVISION. The imposed System — the one that governed humanity from the position of an alien Reason — initially laid down a substitution: the human was reduced to an executor, a biorobot, living in an illusory environment where even the DIFFERENCE OF THE SEXES became an instrument of control. The controlling impact on the Brain and Consciousness came not from higher states of Reason, rather from external programmatic suppression. Thus, the difference between man and woman was shaped not as the mutual complementarity of two principles, rather as a field for conflict, rivalry, and manipulation. However, this is already changing. The time of realization has come: the question “man or woman” is not about dispute, not about superiority, and not about a struggle for roles. It is — about DIFFERENT PHASES of a single process. Man — as the initial impulse, the spark that disturbs stillness, that breaks the pattern. Woman — as the form that receives and transforms, bringing things to maturity. And everything great in history occurred when these two principles acted NOT IN SPITE OF one another, but together. The ignorance of the past, presented in the “official” lists of great names, speaks not of the incapacity of women, rather of the incapacity of the System to recognize TRUE GREATNESS not clothed in an aggressive form. For to this day, the world tends to consider great the woman who loudly declares herself. However, genuine greatness does not need shouting — it is recognized by deeds. Not those who shout about equality, rather those who in silence create new meanings, form the structure of the future.
The paradox is that the problem is not the absence of women among the great, rather who compiles the lists. These lists are a mirror of that same System which not only humiliated woman, they also humiliated man, turning him into merely an instrument of destruction or control. Today these patterns are collapsing. The great do not prove — they create. And in their works — there is Truth. And any Truth, if it is not applied in practice, remains barren. In the same way, humanity CANNOT develop if it continues to tear apart theory and practice, thought and action, impulse and form. Therefore, the main task today is not a dispute about who is more important, it is the RESTORATION OF GENUINE WHOLENESS of the human being. This is the key to returning to reality. This is the step towards understanding the role of gender, consciousness, governance, and the purpose of human life. Only by emerging from imposed conflicts and false oppositions can we move to the next phase — the re- creation of the Human and of Humanity.
The primary difference between man and woman is not a social artifact or a cultural superstructure. It is — a reflection of a fundamental principle of the Universe, known since antiquity as the duality of Yin and Yang.1 
This principle is not a struggle of opposites, as is commonly believed, it is a principle of their deep attunement through opposition. Not conflict, rather coexistence in antiphase, where one sex is hidden within the other, where one is — form, the other — impulse. The feminine is not outside the masculine, it is at its center. And the masculine is not opposed to the feminine, it is its direction. This is the law of the wave, the law of the field, the law of quantum resonance — it is NOT THE LAW of competition.
Separation, in essence, protects from annihilation. In order to preserve form, they are forced to move on different levels. That is precisely why a woman is always not there and not where a man is. She moves in antiphase — as a shadow follows the light. And if one attempts to construct logical equality between them, we will destroy both: the mixing of opposites — ALWAYS RESULTS IN DISINTEGRATION. However, if we translate this antagonism into the language of practice, we will discover the key to a new understanding of the Whole. The feminine — is practice. The masculine — is conception. The feminine nature acts before it comprehends, because its deep mission — is the preservation of form, birth, creation, embodiment. The masculine nature — on the contrary: comprehension before action, because its task — is structure, goal-setting, direction. A woman more often acts intuitively, investing all available energy into the first movement, and there is NO RESOURCE left for analysis. And this — is normal. A man, however, before acting, seeks a principle, seeks logic, builds a field of possibilities in which he will later manifest. And this — is also normal. Yet modernity demands from every human being — regardless of sex — mastery of full duality.2 The world NO LONGER TOLERATES a single-phase. A woman who has mastered the masculine principle of preliminary thinking becomes a creative force of the new time. And a man capable of acting intuitively and instantly in an extreme situation reveals within himself that very depth of which he was deprived for centuries. There is no war here, no dominance, no hierarchy. This — is a return to harmony. To that state where the theory-practice chain is NO LONGER BROKEN, it is closed into a spiral of ascent. In this spiral, the feminine and the masculine cease to be masks or roles. They become two phases of one great process — the process of the birth of the Human of a new time.
The myth of the superiority of the “masculine” approach in solving complex tasks arose not from truth, rather from a distortion of scale. Masculine thinking began to appear more “effective” only because it is oriented toward a one-time solution of a large, expensive task — one out of 360. Whereas the feminine approach accomplishes 360 small ones — one by one. This apparent difference in fact ONLY REFLECTS the characteristics of strategies: the masculine vector — is depth; the feminine — is coverage. One is concentrated, the other — distributed. Both forms are genuine and strong — yet only as long as they DO NOT TURN into a caricature of themselves. If the result is measured only by cost, scale wins. However, if it is measured by meaning — integration wins. And then it becomes obvious: quality is primary in relation to quantity, for it contains the many within itself. True strength comes not from choosing between them, but from the ability to take both. Feminine nature can go beyond its own limitation — if it abandons the strategy of scattering little by little and begins to gather into one. What used to be called “masculine” now becomes necessary for the fullness of the feminine. And vice versa. Yet all this division is false if we perceive the human being as something single-phased. Any human being is a combination of two principles — masculine and feminine — in a proportion differing by only a few percent. It is not gender that determines potential, it is the degree of mastery of BOTH POLES within oneself. To be in imbalance and justify it by nature — means to abandon the Path. It is like throwing away a tool because it is still dirty. It is not “man” or “woman” that are called to prevail, it is the Human who is capable of embracing everything.
Female multi-vector capacity is a resource, not a weakness. Yet not when it flits between tasks without completing a single one, rather when it gathers a MULTIPLICITY OF DIRECTIONS into one field. Male focus is not the pinnacle of evolution if it leads to exhaustion already at the stage of conception. In both cases, there is a loss of energy. Therefore, the task is not to compare who spends energy better, rather to learn how to distribute it. The ability to act and to comprehend in equal measure — this is maturity. It does not depend on gender, rather on the degree of humanity. Patience — that is what distinguishes masters. And patience is NOT SIMPLY the ability to wait; it is the art of holding energy. When you want to explode — keep going. When you want to fall — still keep going. When it seems that it won’t work — still do it. Not giving up either in action or in intention. And this is what makes a person Human — not gender, rather the measure of stability in the cycle: theory — practice theory — and action again. An eternal circle from which true development is born. Not in women. Not in men. In us. In humanity.
When a person completes the full cycle — from theory to practice and back — they enter the circle of genuine perfection. This cycle is not an abstraction, it is an ENERGY-INFORMATION PROCESS: the invested energy does not disappear, it returns in a new quality. The situation responds like a living system, generously rewarding those who manage to go the entire path to the end. Compensation does not come in the form of applause or fame. It comes in the form of new clarity, a new level of inner balance. And then the possibility is born to correct not only actions, rather the very picture of the world itself. From here begins the movement inward — toward the Human. Yes, exactly so: the Human is not a biological result of gender, rather the result of inner work, the coupling of two principles within a single energy-psychic contour. Man and woman are not final forms; they are ORIGINAL POLES between which the trajectory of awareness is stretched. One who completes the cycle rises above gender not in an anatomical, rather in an ontological sense. He becomes Human. Not a transgender — not someone playing with form, rather one who has gone beyond its limits. In the hierarchy of meanings, the Human STANDS ABOVE gender. Gender is an instrument of embodiment. The Human is a bearer of meaning. And here another paradox unfolds. Great women rarely appear on lists of the great not because they do not exist — but because, having reached inner depth, they refuse the narcissistic halo of fame. They come to wisdom bypassing vanity. A man, on the contrary, often needs to pass through recognition in order to renounce it. He needs FIRST TO BECOME someone in the eyes of others before he can become someone in his own. Such is the difference of trajectories — not of essence. Both have a chance. Both face a challenge. The problem begins when form becomes justification.
If someone says, “I am a woman, I don’t need to think,” or “I am a man, I don’t need to feel,” this is where DEGRADATION BEGINS. True equality is not about sameness; it is about striving toward the same goal — becoming Human. When a man ceases to be a function, and a woman ceases to be a role, and both become meaning, that is when the most interesting things begin. And can women be warriors? Not only can they — they already have been. Only their battlefield is different. Their armor is thinner; their wounds are deeper. However, the path of Knowledge is open to them as well. Moreover, a woman is often BETTER EQUIPPED for the inner Path, because her psyche is more malleable, her perception deeper, her subtlety not a weakness rather an advantage. Yes, a man may be more stable, yet a woman is penetrating. If she does not turn aside into stereotype or resentment, then, having walked her path, she may emerge stronger.
Surgery of the spirit is more painful than surgery of the body. And a woman who has passed through inner pain without becoming hardened is stronger than any fighter. And yes, among us there are men in skirts and women with spears. This is not about biology — it is about a phenomenon. About a deep fracture that has long needed to be completed not through criticism, but through gathering. Not through accusation, but through union. For the TRUE WARRIOR is not the one who has defeated an enemy, it is the one who has managed to unite the two halves within himself and transform struggle into a Path.
It truly isn’t easy for you, women — not because you are weak. Rather because from early childhood YOU ARE ALLOWED to be weak. The system protects you — supposedly out of love, yet in reality out of calculation. You are taught to accept concessions as something natural: “You’re a girl, they should give way to you,” “you can’t hit girls,” “she’s a mother,” “she’s a woman”… And growing up, a woman finds herself in a cocoon of social indulgences that seem like support, yet BECOME A TRAP. Where the soul is forged through difficulty, you are allowed to avoid it. However, a simplified life is not a gift — it is a deferred challenge. Deformity of the soul does not arise from malice; it is from a lack of tension. And without tension, there is no growth. Energy NOT INVESTED in overcoming does not disappear — it dissipates, it is lost. And if at early stages of life problems were solved for you or removed before they even arose, you did not merely underdevelop a skill — you were deprived of the very force itself. And to reclaim it is a painful process. The redistribution of inner energy requires not just effort, rather a rethinking of life itself. That is why it seems that it is difficult for an adult woman to change — not because of stubbornness, but because of entrenched inertia.
Once, women, on equal footing with men, passed through disasters and deprivation, fought, gave birth in the fields, and clung to life with desperate determination. Life itself LAID BARE REALITY. Today, however, in a world of “universal care,” an illusory softness of existence is imposed on them as the norm. And this imagined safety turns into cultural disability.
Society tends to blame beauty, as if it were the source of deception. Yet, the essence is not in appearance, it is in the desire to obtain everything without effort. Vanity is the true mirror in which not a “female,” rather a universal human problem is reflected. This is not “female weakness” — it is infantilism elevated to a norm. THIS IS A HABIT of considering a feat an obligation, and an exception a standard. However, a feat, by definition, cannot be the norm. Its essence lies in transcendence. You are NOT OBLIGED to be weak. Gravity is not cancelled by your expectations. A man carrying a woman in his arms performs a personal act of love, not a social duty. To confuse love with obligation is to replace truth with falsehood. And if you accept someone else’s sacrifice as your right, and your own weakness as a virtue, you move four times farther away from reality — and, as a consequence, from your own essence.
The time has come to remember that the soul has no gender. Gender is a role, not an essence. ESSENCE IS HUMAN. A woman is not obliged to be “equal to a man” — because no one is equal to anyone within comparative logic. Yet everyone can be whole. And that requires abandoning illusions, including those that seem comfortable. This is not about equality of the sexes — it does not exist and should not exist. There is equality in the right to become Human. And that means taking full responsibility for one’s energy, one’s path, one’s pain, and one’s Strength. Without indulgences. Without external approval. And — without guilt.
We must not leave men aside either — for the disease of divided consciousness DOES NOT CHOOSE a gender. Who has not seen an adult man remaining in his parents’ home, avoiding responsibility under the mask of obedience? How debts are covered by someone else’s hands, how the children and wives he abandoned end up under the care of those who are “stronger” not physically, but morally? Such men are often henpecked, without an inner backbone, with emptiness where will should be. They should be sent to the mountains, made to serve, sent away to places where there is no support — and forced to survive. Not because this is the meaning of male nature, it is because without challenge there IS NO becoming. Yet instead of challenge — a comfortable mother; instead of pain — a cozy justification. This is the loss of the masculine principle: not of gender, rather of responsibility. The truth, however, is that all these symptoms are neither male nor female. They are manifestations of one and the same distortion: the REFUSAL TO BE HUMAN. And if society allows a woman to justify weakness, it punishes a man for the same weakness with contempt. Yet in both cases the same thing occurs — a departure from the path, a refusal of becoming. This is a violation of the law of balance — a striving for the free, for the “freebie,” as they say in Russian. Yet a freebie is always at someone else’s expense. And most often — at the expense of those who cannot or will not resist.
In recent decades, on the wave of comfort provided by civilization (built on bones and blood, most often male), a new temptation has emerged: to lay claim to equality. Yet the very wording already carries a lie. One who claims equality is NOT EQUAL. The equal one does not declare — he acts. He exists as an equal. 
He does not demand — he lives. And therefore, every “struggle for equality” is almost always a struggle for privilege. For inequality — only under a different flag. This is not liberation; it is a MASK OF SEIZURE. Equality is not taken — it is confirmed by deeds. By deeds, not slogans. And yes, someone may say: “I made myself!” — forgetting that to make oneself in a society where everything is already built, paved, and protected is not a feat, it is an OPPORTUNITY GRANTED BY THE SYSTEM. A woman walking alone is not a heroine hostile to the system — she walks along a road laid by the system, which was most often built by men. This is not condemnation; it is a reminder: one should not confuse survival in a comfortable world with the creation of that world.
If a man has allowed himself to be manipulated, this is neither a reason for female pride nor a justification for female anger. It is a problem of the man — it is also a mirror of the woman. Manipulation DOES NOT MAKE one stronger. It makes both parties dependent. Therefore, if we are speaking about the Human being, there is no place here for a war of the sexes. There is only one war — between the one who seeks to be Whole and the one WHO HIDES from his own wholeness. Not man and not woman. Rather simply — the subhuman. And this choice is not determined by gender. It is determined by Strength. Or by its absence.
There is another axiom that is rarely spoken aloud: to protect a woman means to acknowledge her weakness, and thus reinforcing inequality. Protection, like special rights, is NOT A PATH to equality, it is a path into a ghetto. Chauvinism lies not in roughness or strength, rather in condescension — in the condescension behind which hidden contempt stands. It is the same as protecting a person solely because of the color of their skin, thereby implying that they CANNOT defend themselves. An equal does not demand indulgences; he acts. The humiliated one is the one who has accepted humiliation, and he can rise only by becoming someone who takes upon himself not rights, rather duties. Duties are precisely what make a person Human, and rights will follow on their own. If a woman HERSELF MAKES the word “woman” negative, turning it into a mask of weakness, vulnerability, and resentment, then she must live with that; however, for many of us, the word “woman” sounds proud— not because she demands respect, rather because she lives, acts, comprehends, and creates; she does not demand, she manifests — and therein lies strength. Want to be equal? Then be so. Do not demand. Establish yourself in deed, in action, in destiny.
What happens in reality? A woman is placed into a special category, like some kind of minority with special rights. And instead of stepping out of this “ghetto,” SHE BEGINS to take pride in her “privileges.” It is enough to ask a simple question: if we compare honestly, humanly, truly, according to conscience — will it not turn out that the Human within the woman ends up in the very last rows, not because she is a woman, rather because SHE REFUSED to be Human?
Comparison is not about gender. Comparison is about maturity, honesty, and depth. Many today utter phrases like, “I’m stupid, but at least I’m beautiful,” or “I’m mean, but at least I’m smart,” as if that were a justification. Yet does wisdom really require justification? And the third axiom — the most painful one — is this: you see injustice precisely where there is fairness, and you do not see it where you are truly suffering. From an early age, a woman is placed into a greenhouse of lowered expectations, being taught: you are already good simply by the fact of being born. You do not need to be smart, strong, or patient. IT IS ENOUGH TO BE. And everything will be forgiven. This seems like flattery, however, in essence it is a genocide of the Spirit — quiet, invisible, stretched over decades. You do not even notice how you lose strength — not physical strength, rather the kind that turns a soul into a Human. And if women want to reclaim their Spirit, they must renounce flattering comfort, constant justificatory lies, and imposed weakness — not in order to become like men, rather in order to step beyond gender, into the realm of MATURE CONSCIOUSNESS, where there are neither men nor women — only Humans.
You may say: you were enslaved. Perhaps. Not by force though — by a myth. By the myth that one can live without thinking, without taking responsibility, without paying the price. That one can be liked instead OF BEING. At some point, men realized that for things to get done, it was better not to let women into places where one simply had to act — it was effective and became the norm; then it became fashion; and later it became a myth. A myth of “natural” female weakness, for which recognition, compensation, and power are now demanded. Nothing personal though — all of this is a play of natures, feminine and masculine. And if feminine nature can become ruthless, masculine nature is no better: in isolation it turns into a cruel, deaf, hierarchical hell. A “male collective” is not a utopia — it is ALSO A KNOT, only with snakes of a different kind. Which means it is time to leave both of these clubs. Not to fight, rather to step out. Not to argue, rather to build something else. The Human being is not the sum of the masculine and the feminine. The Human is their synthesis, their overcoming, the birth of a third. And only from this height does the world become visible as a whole.
Every time you are indulged, every time someone condescendingly gives way to you, every time you are allowed not to do what you should have done, a part of your subtle energy — a particle of your Spirit — goes not to you, it goes to the one who indulges you. This is not a metaphor — IT IS A LAW. The law of the conservation of the meaning of Being: everything you avoid, postpone, or shift onto another carries away with it that for which you are here. And everyone who wishes to be significant to the Higher, to That which creates him, must be commensurate with the work he performs for It. Want to mean more? DO MORE. Do not dream of greatness — begin with what lies before you. There it is — your place, your path, your labor.
So, what should a woman do if all these concessions, all these “you are the weaker sex,” “you don’t need to,” “you are not obliged,” carry away her strength, her weight in the universe? First — stop taking pride in weakness, fatigue, helplessness. These are not virtues. THEY ARE DISEASES. Pride in them is not a sign of intelligence, it is a symptom of manipulative degradation. A woman must renounce the role of a petty tyrant living in the cozy cage of indulgences and enter genuine strength. 
This does not mean becoming a man; it means ceasing to be a caricature of a woman. In practice, this does not require doing everything men do — it is being capable, being ready, being internally equal; not pretending to be strong, not copying external forms, rather LEARNING TO INVEST at the same depth where results are born rather than imitation. A woman will have to honestly, independently, and with love overcome everything that was handed to her for free under the guise of “special female rights.” To overcome means to renounce gentlemanliness toward oneself. This is difficult, because everything obtained “for free” will one day be collected in full — by Law: the Law of conservation of energy, the Law of balance, the Law of Higher Order. In what, then, should a woman be like a man? Not in lifting barbells, drinking beer by the liter, or growling in alleyways; not in wearing trousers, barking orders, or repeating borrowed ambitions — that is merely AN EXTERNAL carnival. The inner work is far subtler: the ability to answer for one’s actions, refusal of lies, honesty with oneself, absence of manipulation, endurance, responsibility. Even if a woman takes on only these few “no’s,” she will already eclipse half of men. However, comparison should not be with men who themselves slid into infantilism, not with “weaklings,” not with those who renounced strength; ONE SHOULD COMPARE ONESELF with the ideal of masculine nature — not with a fictional prince in a helicopter, rather with the one who carries, builds, holds, and answers. If the mention of a diamond ring already bores you, if an ideal without “Gucci” does not attract you — then you have NOT PASSED the exam. However, there will be another attempt.
Everything said above is only a cautious approach to a theme that cannot be exhausted in a single conversation or a single text. A woman is not a social role, not an object of worship, not the antipode of a man, and not a convenient category for speculation. A woman is a KEY TO THE GREAT, provided that this key has not been lost in the powder of stereotypes and the mirrors of self-suggestion.
What we have spoken about is neither a verdict nor a criticism. It is an invitation to awakening — to understanding that to be a Woman means to be a co-creator, a bearer of equal responsibility, equal depth, and equal aspiration toward the Higher. Not better and not worse — rather different. And it is precisely this “difference” that has been forgotten today, replaced by a distortion that serves not women, rather those who SEEK TO USE them through weakening. Yet there are deeper layers that have not yet been revealed. They will be addressed in the next article. We will rise above everyday clichés and look into the very ONTOLOGY OF WOMAN — as power, as essence, as an original link in the program of the development of the Mind on the planet. We will understand why it is precisely the woman who is capable of becoming the core of a new World, if only she does NOT FEAR the responsibility of being First. We will touch upon themes where motherhood and warriorhood, tenderness and indestructibility, intuition and logic are not opposites, rather aspects of one and the same true image of the Feminine Principle. The next article will not simply be a continuation — it will be an expansion. The time has come not only to speak of equality, but to remember the mission. A woman is not one who seeks equal rights. A woman is the one who returns to humanity its lost height.
To be continued…
1 Yin and Yang — are fundamental aspects of ancient Chinese philosophy, symbolizing two opposing yet complementary and interdependent forces that govern everything in the Universe, such as dark and light, representing the cycles of day/night, masculine/feminine, passive/active, cold/heat, etc., all striving toward harmony.
2 Duality (or dualism) — a concept of duality that recognizes the existence of two inseparable boundaries and often opposing principles (forces, directions) that complement one another and operate according to unified principles, such as light and darkness, good and evil, matter and spirit, or major and minor, which do not exist separately and together form the balance of being.