Life goes on...

About the Spirit,
the Mind
and many other things...

lodka

 

 

 

 

znak1

 

rnto znak

 

 

 

 

 

 

    About the Physics of the Cell,
   the Physics of the Brain,
   the Physics of the Energy

369_Series. Salvation of Saviors

Tuesday, 10 August 2021 11:56

016_369 The reason for expediency…

Written by

knigaDownloads: |pdf| |doc| |epub| |fb2| |illustrations|

 

 

 

We all make haste for miracles,
But nothing could be more wonderful
Than that Land under Heaven,
Where your Home is...

All of us, now living, are extraordinary lucky to be involved in the historical events on the restoration of the true normal life conditions on our planet. We are eye witnessing extremely large-scale in their depth and essence, time and space, complexity and pinpoint accuracy PROCESSES OF REAL TRANSFORMATION of both the life-providing environment around us and ourselves, which are basically taking place without our proper awareness of the ongoing. All this is BEYOND OUR CAPABILITIES to influence the ongoing. This should be taken for granted, without making sudden conclusions, even relying on the information that flows endlessly and it is incredibly difficult to sort it out. Even for those who consider themselves “knowledgeable, understanding and selected”. This is tough time, the time of changes in everything we have got used to, learned, known, striven for, aspired to, dreamed of and planned. Everything is changing, but this is not some kind of apocalypse. Man is cared for and supported, but this does not mean getting manna from heavens. We have already begun and we still have to overcome a lot of difficulties, we will have to REDISCOVER the true, entirely different World, find new technologies of a higher level and order, and re-develop our native Earth under quite different environmental conditions. Look at those floods, hurricanes, temperature drop, unusual phenomena in the atmosphere, fires in vast territories, the violent behavior of the so-called «Virus» walking around the world — this is the confirmation of what I am writing about. There can be no instructions for actions here. Any initiative is to be welcome. But the main thing, in my opinion, is still PEOPLE’S QUEST FOR knowledge and understanding, even though the most real for some reason always appears to be the most distant. And the most real of nowadays, which pure existence, expediency and understanding belong to, are so different from human concepts and reflections that they neither resonate nor cooperate with them, but use them in their own interests. Expediency works through causality. Hence the serene, even careless calmness with which people inventory their shattered knowledge and understanding. Even if today only human things can be noticed by the human mind; there is no calamity or limitation here. Something different, high and abstract WILL NOT MANIFEST ITSELF otherwise than hidden in the ordinary. One ought to look closely at what has become familiar in order to see how it is used by the permanent forms for one’s own purposes, and even more so today, in this cycle of events taking place around us and before our eyes. The world in its entirety would be discovered and understood — if cause and effect were clarified. But they are not and WILL NEVER BE. From the clarity of this darkness there comes out a final understanding, full of inexplicable interest. So is the opposition between causal and goal explanations. The goal does not displace the cause, but just stands next to it as the master from another world. In expediency, we see a remarkable phenomenon of domination of non-being over being, of that which does not yet exist, over that which exists or is happening. And therefore, one should not calm down when facing a primitive scheme, as if expedient action first exists in the mind. Rest assured that “an expedient action” does not exist in advance in any sphere of the intellectual world available to us and is comprehended only retroactively, and is not guided from the very beginning by some predetermined plan of the expediency.

1

The point of the goals is not in the concept, but IN THE BEING ITSELF, which for our vision is not different from non-being and is not reduced to the potential existence of the goal in the mind. In the end, the phenomena of expediency have, as it seems, the form of existence that is eternally real. They are hidden from us precisely by their eternal reality. Precisely because they always already exist in advance, already have an unconditional existence, not needing anything anymore that is why they paradoxically remain in non-existence for us and turn out to be the goal. But this, in my opinion, is the dark side of the subject, requiring the most precise research and effort in thinking. The fact that the main non-existent, subject to implementation first of all, remains something eternally abiding, is no longer a mystery, the acuteness of which today is more and more manifested by everything that is happening around us and everything that gives us the possibility to know why we ended up exactly in the situation in which we find ourselves today, and what has happened on our Earth for the last 18,000 years, and most importantly — what it could result in if it WAS GIVEN to be realized! I do not feel like softening the edges of the happened or happening today. I do want the information given in the series 369 of articles to change the very essence of your understanding, requiring more and more attention and comprehension of the information. In my opinion, it is the most important goal.

Today, the majority takes as a basis an arbitrarily chosen statement they like and from it deduce their truths, which constitute the pattern of life. Why do people never ask themselves the question what the statement they like grew out of, which they raised to the status of the absolute truth? I suppose they subconsciously DO NOT WANT to know the parents of their truth out of some unknown fear that they will not like their parents. And the truth they produced suddenly starts shaking. And Man does not want his truths to shake. Any threat to something that has been established and accepted as a matter of fact, people take as the threat to life. Therefore, they are NOT INCLINED to comprehend their “abc truths”, which mostly are taken from the past. People are determined to defend their only landmarks. Losing them is like going blind. Therefore, people, and especially nowadays, react negatively to unfamiliar information. Whoever wants to understand, and NOT TAKE it on faith, seeks to get to the very original starting point of all his truths. I see this point as striving for the good in the full meaning of this word. This helps to understand the true intentions of people and not to deceive or be deceived.

To make the world a better place, you ought to understand human nature as it is, and not as it is portrayed by moralizers. They attribute qualities to Man that he cannot have due to many things. People try to respond to these qualities, but since it is impossible to go against nature, they have no choice but to be hypocritical. This is also trying to be good. But if hypocrisy is good for us, WE ARE NOT HONEST, so I'm still inclined to believe that linking ourselves to the past is an indicator of narrow-mindedness for the most part. Traditions in modern society are “sharpened” under this link — for example, it is considered bad not to come to burial places in order to honor the memory of the dead, it is important to celebrate event — related days — birth, a lot of holidays and memorable dates like years lived together, memorial events of the worthy past years — placing tablets, monuments, journalism «in memory of ...», honorably unearthing and clarifying the details of some events of the past without hope of knowing the actual events. Any direct deviations from the above are sincerely condemned or at least met with misunderstanding, cause a restrained rejection of any direct deviations from the above — the violation of traditions is somehow associated with a violation of the stability of existence, and therefore trigger hostility. No one knows any adequate and unemotional reasons for this. “There is no past without future” can just as well be attributed to clichés as the tradition of arranging cemeteries exactly the way they are arranged now, for example, in Siberia. But it is different in Europe. In India, they bury in a different way. Clichés are of different scales and patterns, but still these are unconscious and the rules that are not understood by people but just followed, because otherwise either uncertainty and instability, or censure, due to which there can also be uncertainty and instability. Or they don't follow, but then they don't advertise it, so as not to run into condemnation, the constant pressure of which is also uncertainty and instability. However, man is a single construction, and humanity is a multitude. The comfortable existence of many different “units” is the stability that everyone wants, but within the framework of the OLD IMPOSED CONTROL. Therefore, many of those who are familiar with the ongoing are wondering — when this transitional period will end, when it will become easier, when and who or through what this load will be removed… NEVER rush to answer but think and the answer WILL COME. What for is this fixed self-sufficient, non-developing structure? Such a construction, as we know, is the Ebres “civilization”. “People have tried it” — the failures of this option are obvious. This means that we have to look for another way — which is not perceived by the current multitude of human minds, because it is impossible due to inconsistency with the existing attitudes in the mind.

2And when they began to be changed from the outside, we, every single human of the existing set, began to creak and groan, slowly shaking, pulling (using all the arsenal of possibilities and intellect) our traditions to new attitudes, clinging to them and changing them at the same time in order to keep within the given vector. In this respect, I consider what I write in my articles and books, to be constructions that facilitate and accelerate the “breakdown” that people are experiencing.

I try to encourage the readers, make their Brains change faster and more perfectly, but these changes demand of me to constantly increase the depth and scale of what I am writing and providing as information, which is either accepted and understood, or not accepted and rejected.

3If a present day reader of my writings turns to my works of 7-8 years ago, he might be puzzled to some extent with what was written for him of 7-8 years ago sample. And so what? To give oneself over wholly to traditions and generally accepted norms? How to correlate the postulates on the eternity of some unshakable truths with what is happening, in which one's own convictions break, change and improve daily? But nevertheless, in everyday terms, human oneness and human multitude are reality, and they need to somehow be reconciled and combined, and this is possible only to those who think in the realities of the ongoing (right or wrong is not important, the main thing is thinking). Therefore, even if I am convinced, for example, that the use of a medical mask is nonsense, I will still wear it out of respect for those who consider it nonsense not to use it under the current conditions. If I am convinced of something that others DO NOT ACCEPT, I will still respect them, because I respect their own beliefs, even if they are different from mine, but at least they are. Moreover, on a different scale of perception, everyone is mistaken.

In many works, I propose in my reasoning and diagrams to rely strictly on the foundation built from the blocks of information on the programmed improvement of the Brain genotypes under the control of the Ebres system. However, as I am getting convinced, this base is too imperfect and unreliable (for many), if only because, like the analogous blocks of the foundation for the worldview of the civilization dying now, it is too rigidly fixed and limited. No matter how hard you try, IT DOES NOT BECOME the basis on which the reader can reliably build anything. It itself is a superstructure. The basis for the majority of readers is perceived, as I understand it, to be something else, some kind of arrangement that allowed these Ebres plans to have been realized (as we know, not to the end) and «start off» what is now happening in all its scale. But anyway, some of the information that I give for thought, the reader has to take for granted. Probably, for some of them it is very comfortable, but for others it is not. We, each of us, look at what is happening out of our depth, and I am never tired of being surprised that there are people who readily replace the old foundation, religious, atheistic, or any other — with a new one similar in structure, just with different characters. Well, probably, this is still a step forward (or at least taking your butt off the sofa), but is that enough? Any gaps in the understanding of the ongoing are closed with the wording “it was determined by the program” — without expanding on the basis of which such capabilities, with the use of which such constructions it had been implemented. Any explanation that the current society (and its individual representative) is able “to digest” should be based on some OLD FOOTING OF UNDERSTANDING reality due to the lack of others; otherwise this explanation SIMPLY IS NOT ACCEPTED. I still try to “pull out” of the conceptual apparatus of a modern rather intellectually developed person (but, unfortunately, there are not that many of them) separate constructions and connect them with the new system of worldview and his type of thinking. This, at minimum, results in an expansion of the understanding and outlook of anyone who reads what is offered to him. It doesn't matter whether he agrees with the above or not. Any result of introduction expands the scope of understanding. And then the definitions fade into the background — only understanding remains. Any individual or total current fact can be easily pulled up by a person for his own framework of thinking, or just rejected. The process of collating one’s understanding or way of thinking with someone else will irreversibly change the original way of thinking or understanding. Even if the proposed, for some reason, is rejected. Only that which is not touched upon will not change. Proving and trying to convey something to someone who DOES NOT WANT IT seems like a fully waste of time and effort — but just introduction, even with a categorical rejection, MORE THAN LIKELY, will somehow change the framework of thinking, make the Brain work a little differently — even if “complete nonsense” is said loudly — the seed is already! planted — and after a while it will give roots under the influence from the outside. In my opinion, this is how “translation” works — it is perceived and deciphered by everyone in line with the Brain capabilities and basic training. It is good if all this is harmoniously combined, and if not, it just takes time and, most importantly, a state of search. For example, in the previous articles I deliberately took the mentality as a kind of multy-dimensional concept, but for many it is a “vague concept”.

I made an attempt to seize on it in the consciousness and understanding of each reader. Surely, all related constructions of understanding have expanded — but everyone who has read, has definitely changed significantly in his thinking, even if he DID NOT AGREE with the read. Do I have the right to hope that someone will understand, perceive it as realizable and begin to act in the direction of the information that is given, even if it is not given directly, but directed discretely? After all, it is only working for its creators.

And are there many individuals in the current society who may not understand, but AT LEAST COME to get acquainted with this information just to comprehend it? And is it possible to bring a goal, an idea to someone in this way? I do not think so. But you can bring the consciousness and the way of thinking to the state in which the goal can be perceived or generated, come into being, lowered to the level of the active consciousness (and the consciousness is raised to the required level) of the one who is now reading and either does not understand, or does not accept, or is rebelling when trying to understand this tangle of approaches to the nature of man, consciousness, reason, which is tied to the concept of mentality. However, an additional and essential bonus of digging through this mess is leading to the important conclusion that the construct of the mind of even the most respected and venerable scientists in any field of science (scientific knowledge) is extremely limited in its majority. And those that are less limited can be counted on the fingers of one hand. And it turns out that there is NO ONE to rely on, so there is only one way out — for everyone to sort out the information and look for one’s own answers.

4Nowadays, the amount of available information allows a person to comprehend that unknown, in which his mind is motivated. The quantity and quality of vital information is between the level of one’s own knowledge and the mind ability to grow within the framework of the adequate understanding. The level of the mind's ability to grow is directly proportional to the amount of information already absorbed by the mind. That is, the more you know, the more you want to know. The framework of the adequate understanding is that which does not allow the mind to fantasize and, of course, lie, but within the framework of the specific mentality (the brain genotype).

The parasitic way of life, understood through the kind of bio-variants of pictures from the fate of mushrooms, roundworms and various “riders”, flies and other things that were conveyed to us at school lessons in natural history and biology, unambiguously and deeply rooted in us NOT ONLY viciousness and, as if, injustice of such a life arrangement, and the strict one-sided nature of this, with a less superficial attitude to the multifaceted and ambiguous phenomenon.

5As a small impetus to the expanding our ideas in this area, we can consider and try to comprehend the possibility of implementing parasitic development (development at the expense of others), parasitic nutrition (nutrition at the expense of other organisms, that is, to their detriment), parasitic recovery (restoration of the «shirt» using, for example, the potential of another Brain) — and the like, no less absurdly unambiguous and, as it were, perceived exactly as the elder generation in the person of parents, educators, teachers and others have taught us. Only when you start thinking in this direction, try to avoid the accepted: that the student should be grateful to the teacher, and the teacher needs to convey his knowledge, that this is not parasitism; that a healer / doctor / is devoted to his profession and for him his life's work is to restore lost health; that the existing food chains are closed, and if you look in perspective, the use of someone for food is a kind of fundamental life base, which means that, a priori, it is wonderful and it CANNOT BE attributed to parasitism — then you can successfully, thoroughly and convincingly separate the severe and unscrupulous parasitism from a certain vital necessity — well, otherwise it is just impossible, you need to eat something in order not to die ... and in general, for the encroachment on the sacred — “...you can get a slap on the neck”. The given example is our thinking in the so-called “binary system of thinking”, about which everything is written in detail in the book by N. Levashov “The Final Appeal to Mankind”.

“The basis of the severely distorted personality is the concept of YES AND NO, as if they were real and manifested many times in the multistage analysis of any complex process. For all that, the number of levels in the analysis is usually very small, even if the problem you are analyzing is quite complicated. The search for a solution comes down to choosing one out of two possibilities, where two possible solutions exist, whereas the most correct solution lies somewhere in between”.

Without aggravating a delicate problem, somehow covered with a rather unsuccessful camouflage, it is enough FOR YOURSELF TO TOUCH the indicated aspects of your own existence — but not to reproach yourself for the use of explicit or latent parasitism (although it is not forbidden — in fact, it turns out to be an entertaining and developing occupation) relatively completely innocent «donors», but in order to realize this phenomenon as integral and multifaceted — if the parasite does not have a “donor”, then all this complexity and multifaceted nature will begin to fall apart, at the same time forming from its own remains and fragments a variety of simplified parasitic structures until the stage of the final completion of their fading-dying functioning — on the condition of the complete cessation of the external control of the old CS and overcoming the auto-motor-like thinking, which it nevertheless left in us. And with the current process of the control changing within the framework of the new (native) CS, all the participants in the former functional-constructive organization will be reshuffled, sifted and, after rearranging in line with other functional-target endowments, form some other constructions, which we are observing today and TRYING TO COMPREHEND. The painfulness of such a process is determined by the complete misunderstanding and lack of awareness by its participants of what is happening due to their own severely distorted organization — for those who have always taken, it is extremely difficult even to think that not to take and give is possible.To those who have always given seems incredible to take something. This is in a primitive version for an approximate understanding of the magnitude of the problem. Again, examples not burdened with complex everyday collisions. An American, happily living on unemployment benefits, finds it difficult to understand an unreasonable need to start any activity. It will be even more difficult for a penned in single mother who is “pulling” out two children to explain that she needs to stop slaving for some “uncle” and find something to do. But the point, on the whole, should be clear and understandable — if a certain control scheme was organized on a planetary scale its change IMMEDIATELY NOT JUST affects, but is carried out through a fundamental transformation of every controlled element. Through everyone! Accepting the fact, that the control on a parasitic basis is being changed (in our understanding) for some other, we, as the elements of this very parasitic design, can very limitedly make an assumption about some OTHER STRUCTURE and the principles of its construction. But even in this case, our ideas and fantasies will be built in line with the old «parasitic» scheme. We are doomed, according to the characteristics of our Brain and consciousness, to use what has been given. It is so unambiguously limited that any option outside its scope, including deeply true in its own direction, will certainly be perceived as «wrong, delusional, and crazy» — and perceived negatively, covertly or explicitly — it will cause REJECTION OF THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY, which will affect at least on ignoring, and more often — outright censure based on misunderstanding.

Today analyzing my life path, and exactly in the paradigm that I outlined above, back in 1993-1994, after the signing “The Agreement on Public Accord” (1994), according to which — few people know about this — we live until now, I realized then that I would live in a disgusting country with a very disadvantaged population, a monstrous elite and more than strange political parties that would chat about their representing the interests of the people. I realized then that all this would be monstrously bad. And in that monstrously bad environment I would have to live, because OUTSIDE RUSSIA I CANNOT LIVE, and Russia is as it is.

6

And I realized even more — I would have to defend this, because all this could collapse overnight. It was very easy to bring down the state at that time. Then, no doubt, occupation troops would appear in the territory of Russia, American helicopters would fly, and everything would become completely fatal. So, you would have to live inside this monstrous disaster. That was a fatal necessity. It would be necessary to love the Given, protect and somehow exist in it. But it is possible to exist as a whole, only WITHOUT LOOSING your human dignity and ideas of your values. And thus my understanding left an imprint on everything that happened. Then I DID NOT HAVE the information I have now, and I thought within the framework of what I wrote about above. And when some very pretentious groups start screaming about how “life in Russia is disgusting”, I can only say one thing: it is even more disgusting than you cry, but only I have known about it for a long time. And if something surprises me, gives me hope, it is that IT IS NOT AS DISGUSTING as it could have been, if not for the events after 2011.04.24. What happened is that the Earth comes to its controlled natural states after the change of the Control System and is getting free from the previous external interventionist control dependence, bringing itself and its programmed states of development harmony into its true nature, IN HIGH RATES rehabilitating in the previous states of the general programmed chronoprocess , and most importantly — bringing all true and native Control Complexes into their effective controlling natural (physical) state. And all this is happening today before our eyes within the framework of the Transition Period, and not somewhere in the distant future! For this purpose, no nomenclature decisions of any former power level of people from the Constructions of the former controlled being are required. All of them are free from “human concern for their own being”. It is NOT AT ALL NECESSARY to be zealous through violence and parasitism, and it will not work. Gone are the days of “interventionist support” in the executing actions of the society of people. But the structure remained, built within the framework of what was conceived in the past — the State. A lot of people think that the state is for all. But the modern so-called elite is ready to adapt to any state — strong, weak, rising, degrading, sovereign, colonial, socialist, liberal, nationalist — just to snatch their piece. Giving is not for the elite. But taking; take away, appropriate, takeover. These cynics do not build the state, but they may well use it effectively — in their own interests. This means that something else is needed — something that will replace the state in our current understanding and ensure the activity and residence of people in the territory that we call the state today. But cynics and today's elite are not suitable for creating such a thing. They are active only when it comes to something personal, individual. And the construction of the New (no matter what it will be called) requires universal participation. This can only be ensured within the framework of the New “Social Agreement”, and within the framework of this agreement, define this New, that will become an idea, ideology, goal — like passion, like creativity, like the highest value. And for such an idea, appropriate elite is needed, for the creation of this new thing. The ideology of such elite can be neither classical communism, nor liberalism, nor capitalism. This means that we ought to think in a different direction, look for examples not in the history of Russia and other non-Western and non-modern societies. It requires HARD WORK OF ANOTHER KIND in its perfection — cognition of a higher level, conscious comprehension and orientation in the development of states and elements of Consciousness and Mind. I do not see any obstacles to this. All of this is possible and not so incredible. There would be will — there would be desire and striving.

7

Once again I say the thought that I have already expressed many times. But it is extremely relevant today and requires constant reminding. Life is like a satellite driven car. The man sits in the back seat. He has no idea where he ultimately wants to go.

The car continues on its way, and the man looks around. And one day he sees a cemetery in the distance...

There are many who are not satisfied with life in a track. They would like to go where they feel like going, not where the road leads. But in order to go to your goal, you need to know the goal of life. Where can a person get such a goal? Take on faith someone's mind games or revelations? But if a person does not want to believe anything, if he wants to know, there is nothing left but to figure it out for himself. I hope, really hope that everything that I write will help in this.

 

<< 015_369 017_369 >>
© 2016-2020 Shkrudnev Feodor