Downloads: |pdf| |doc| |epub| |fb2| |illustrations|
Let us suppose hat we are wise enough to learn and know, but not yet wise enough to control our process of learning and the knowledge itself, and therefore we use it to our own detriment. Even so, knowledge is still better than ignorance...
If our achievements in science are not that great, then our understanding of science itself - its nature, its limits and meaning - is EVEN LESS. We are used to working in a narrow field of science and almost NEVER CONSIDER knowledge AS A WHOLE. We do not ask questions - we answer those already formulated. We DO NOT DESIGN - we implement. Nowadays we are builders, but NOT ARCHITECTS.
Such is the fate of most people today who work with their minds: they DO NOT KNOW what exactly they are building, why it is needed and where the building ends. This is inconvenient and not only psychologically, but also practically: work without understanding the goal is exhausting. EVEN WORSE - it may be in vain.
It may happen that someone, NOT KNOWING the general plan, will build something unnecessary, which will later have to be torn down. Or even worse - will start building
at odds with the rest. Some will strive for height and beauty, others - for strength and simplicity. The result is architectural schizophrenia - a common cause, going in different directions. It seems that this is exactly what is happening nowadays. Everything that the mind creates HAS LONG BROKEN UP into two worlds: science and philosophy, which today has been replaced by the made-up word - sociology (not philosophers, but sociologists philosophize today). The very splitting of names IS ALARMING. If the mind is one, if the truth is one, where does such a difference come from? But the difference is not in words. The difference is in the essence. Science and sociology (philosophy) NOT ONLY call the same thing differently. They oppose each other. Their arguments are unconvincing to opponents. Their methods are mutually exclusive. Their goals DO NOT COINCIDE. Each considers itself the only source of the truth. And therefore THERE IS NO unity of knowledge. With such a split, skepticism becomes the most reasonable choice. How can one believe in the power of work that has neither single goal, nor common method, nor agreement even on what exactly should be built? There is only one way: to look around and try to see the WHOLE PICTURE - not as a scientist, not as a philosopher, and especially not as a political scientist, but as an observer. We, who have always been inside, are trying for the first time to LOOK FROM OUTSIDE and this is an undoubted plus. But this is impossible if you DO NOT GO beyond science and philosophy and think outside the dispute, without taking the side of either of them. You need to stand on the platform from which any knowledge begins – THE PLATFORM OF COMPREHENSIVENESS. It is comprehensiveness that unites reason and the truth. This is neither a school, nor a system, nor a method. This is an original ability of the mind: TO COMPREHEND THE MEANING. Everything a person does is an expression of this ability. Everything he seeks is meaning, and not just information. If so, then the dispute between science and philosophy can be resolved not on their field, but ABOVE THEM - in the plane of comprehension. Comprehension is not knowledge about something, but knowledge ABOUT THE FORM of knowledge itself. It does not provide content, but sets the framework. This is what allows us to see what can be considered knowledge, where it begins and where it ends. Based on the idea of comprehension, we will be able to:
- define what science is in its pure form;
- indicate its boundaries;
- describe the internal structure of scientific knowledge;
- understand how science relates to man, his nature and will.
If we accept comprehension as an ORGAN OF MIND, then we can talk not only about the form, but also about the content. We will be able not only to describe the structure of comprehension, but also indicate what truths should fill it. And if these truths do not yet exist, we will show how and where they can be found. And this is the most important thing in the context of what is happening today...
Possibility
Overcoming old age, within the framework of the global idea - victory over death, is possible in two fundamentally different ways. THE FIRST WAY focuses on preserving the body: this can be the lifting of the Hayflick1 limit, growing new organs, bioengineering, or even radical forms of transformation - in the form of metamorphosis, where a human, like a caterpillar, turns into something else, while preserving the core of the personality. THE SECOND WAY relies on PRESERVING the personality, regardless of the biological carrier. It is assumed that personality can be transferred to another "platform" - both material (another body, computer) and immaterial (virtual environment, digital avatar). The first way is within the competence of medical and biotechnological science. The second way does not have a specialized field yet: just as before the emergence of aviation there was no profession of a pilot, today we have no experts in personality transfer. And yet, it is this direction that looks more promising, if we proceed from the priority of consciousness over the body shell. This is what modern science believes. But there is also the THIRD WAY, which in today's understanding of people is more than fantasy. This is THE BRAIN POTENTIALS DEVELOPMENT, which on its own, within the framework of the processes taking place today, is capable of prolonging the life of the body (or rather, its shirt) for at least 134 years, OVERCOMING AGING, that is confirmed by the calculations of A. Khatybov2 in his already known works. And if this process begins to be realized, then the second stage in the development of the Brain is the extension of the life of the body (shirt) to NOT LESS than 300-350 years, without elements of aging of the organism as it was in Russia, beyond the Urals, at the end of the 17th century, at the beginning of the reign of Peter I.
Within the framework of our current understanding, it is IMPOSSIBLE to say DEFINITELY which path will be the main one. But there is an empirical rule: THE MORE minds are focused on the task, THE HIGHER the probability of its solution. The maximum concentration of resources - intellectual, organizational, economic - radically accelerates the achievement of the goal. If the resources are minimal, progress will be slow, and VICTORY OVER DEATH and overcoming old age within the limits that I wrote is possible only after several generations.
A historical analogy is the mastery of atomic energy. The great minds of the 20th century, including Einstein, believed that humanity would be able to use the atom energy NOT EARLIER than in 500 years, that is, by 2400. However, the first atomic explosion occurred in 1945 - just 34 years AFTER THE DISCOVERY of the atom structure in 1911.
What is the secret of such rapid progress? - The emphasis not on natural development, but on the concentration of efforts. In 1939, German physicists informed the leadership of the Third Reich about the possibility of creating a new type of weapon. This became the reason for the launch of the "Uranium Project" in Germany. The same year, Einstein and his colleagues addressed the American president, reporting on German developments. This is how the American "Uranium Committee" was born, which in 1942 grew into the Manhattan Project - a large-scale government undertaking that surpassed the German efforts hundreds of times in resources and numbers. The result - the USA was THE FIRST TO CREATE an atomic bomb. Today, science is moving forward evenly, without a sharp concentration of efforts. Therefore, forecasts do not sound encouraging: death, according to scientists, can be defeated in 200-300 years. But if the intellectual and organizational resources of at least one large state are directed to this goal, the chances of achieving the result in the current century WILL INCREASE SHARPLY. Thus, overcoming death becomes not only a scientific task, but also a matter of civilization choice - a political and cultural project. In order to focus national and ideally global resources on this goal, it is necessary NOT JUST to do the science, but TO CREATE CONDITIONS for its rapid development. Humanity today is like a ship without a course, which passengers are busy fishing, not knowing where the vessel is heading. The most important task is to set its course. Fish - earthly goods - let it remain a pleasant bonus along the way, but NOT THE GOAL.
Variations.
If all the hares, without collusion, avoid meat - this indicates that meat DOES NOT CONFORM to their nature. Similarly: if about two hundred states on the planet, independently of each other, DO NOT PUT overcoming death on the agenda, then this goal contradicts the very nature of the state and the existing world system. To understand the reason for ignoring, let us imagine the world as a room filled with balloons – the states. Each balloon exists only because it RESISTS PRESSURE from its neighbors. If the balloon weakens, others will immediately begin to squeeze it. This is an illustration of the INEXORABLE LAWS of politics, society and physics: the pressure continues as long as there is an opportunity to push through. The growth of the state's power leads to the growth of pressure. State borders are lines where forces have reached equilibrium, where further advancement is impossible.
Under conditions of constant pressure, the state is forced to concentrate resources on its defense capability. This requires the mobilization of the significant part of the intellectual and material potential to create NEW TYPES OF WEAPONS. If the state directs these resources not against external threats, but, for example, against death, into science and humanitarian goals, it will become vulnerable. Other states, acting according to old laws, WILL NOT FAIL to take advantage of its weakness. This explains why there is not a single state in the world that would put overcoming death at the center of its policy. Moreover, such a state project is impossible in the existing system. In order for resources to start working NOT AGAINST life, but AGAINST DEATH, it is necessary to change the very architecture of the world order, to eliminate the constant threat from other states. Only in the safe environment is it possible to reorient the civilization vector. And we MUST NOT forget the main thing - the state itself is a "product" created within the framework of the Brain Genotype Development Program, then everything falls into place. All that we are observing today is the destruction of the structure of the state and statehood within the framework of the activities of the new Control System, through the so-called "ruling class", which just DOES NOT UNDERSTAND what it is doing and what all this will lead to in the near future. The most complex processes of changing the world order are underway with all the ensuing consequences that are OUT OF THE CONTROL of people. But there is already a stable understanding that these processes are leading us to a completely new world order of human life, and these are the FIRST STEPS in the direction of defeating death and overcoming old age. Everything today is interconnected. It is quite possible, against the background of what is happening - an emergence of an ALTERNATIVE OPTION - to concentrate OUTSIDE THE STATE structure intellectual resources comparable in power to the resources of a major power. This approach DOES NOT REQUIRE any restructuring of the entire world system, but it can influence it through the example and achievement of the results. All other scenarios are a movement on a broad front, with scattered efforts and extremely low chances of success in the foreseeable future.
To change the world order, it is necessary to start by understanding how it works, NOT TO RELY on textbooks or news headlines, but look at the essence. To do this, you need to determine who is driving this world - where the locomotive is, and where the carriages are. Today, this locomotive is the West (in the broad sense of the word, including the "ruling elites" of each country). And if we want to change the direction of the train, we need to CHANGE THE COURSE of this leading force. The rest of the world will inevitably follow. The West calls its political system liberal democracy. Its core is THE INSTITUTE OF ELECTIONS. This is the logic: no elections - no democracy. But THE CHOICE IS POSSIBLE only with knowledge. Without knowledge, the choice is illusory, and with it, democracy itself disappears.
The theory states: the people are capable of consciously choosing power. This means that they MUST HAVE the necessary knowledge. But in practice, this is impossible for three reasons. Firstly, not everyone is able to master the necessary amount of information. Secondly, the majority is not ready to spend time and effort on it. Thirdly, a significant part of the information is classified - it is under the heading of state secrets. The conclusion is clear: even in theory, the people CANNOT have all the knowledge necessary for the conscious choice. This is not just a hypothesis - it is strictly proven. For example, the General Possibility Theorem of Kenneth Arrow, mathematically proving the impossibility of constructing an ideal democratic model. Hundreds of researchers tried to disprove this theorem - NO ONE COULD. As a result, they prefer to hush it up, just as they hush up Gödel's theorem, demonstrating the incompleteness of mathematics itself. Ignoring does not cancel the truth - it simply displaces it from consciousness.
If knowledge is unavailable, then all that remains is an IMITATION OF CHOICE. A person is offered a set of candidates, like packages of unfamiliar drugs. He is encouraged to choose one of them - by manipulation, rhetoric, visual presentation. This action looks like a choice, but in fact, it IS NOT. This is not freedom - it is a mild form of coercion.
Some apologists of democracy claim that knowledge is NOT NEEDED for an informed vote - it is enough to be a decent citizen with an "honest heart". Slogans like "Vote with your heart!" sound noble. And so that the heart does not make a mistake - television, social networks and advertising technologies will direct it in the right way.
Plato warned about this in "Gorgias": "If a doctor and an orator stood before a popular assembly, and the discussion turned to whom to choose as a doctor - they would choose the orator. Because there is no topic on which the orator will not convince the crowd better than any specialist ... He can defeat anyone, on any occasion, and achieve everything he wants."
A voter is an old baby. Age and a beard DO NOT TURN him into a sage. His thinking is domestic, emotional, focused on the momentary. He may understand that he is INABLE to choose a chief surgeon or a commander-in-chief, but at the same time SINCERELY BELIEVES that he is able to choose someone who will lead the entire country. This is a paradox: the more complex the object of the control, the simpler the choice seems. Example: imagine that the owner of a candy factory got the right for kindergarten children to decide what to spend the budget on - heating or sweets. When he was asked: "Can children really make such decisions?" - he answered: "Our children are exceptional. Smart, conscientious, they will figure it out!" Those who disagreed with this approach were accused of anti-humanism, hostility to progress and democracy. And in the end - the children were given the right to choose. The result is obvious. They do not think about winter and cold weather. But BRIGHT WRAPPERS - that is what will determine the outcome of the vote. And the discussion will not be about heating or strategy, but about which candies are better - with chocolate or with caramel. The same is true in society: it is naive to believe that a crowd is capable of making a balanced choice. Gilyarovsky once aptly expressed this: “A crowd is a flock of sheep. Where the goat goes, there it goes. But try to persuade a man on Sukharevka to buy something he doesn’t need. It’s a hundred times more difficult. But I can persuade a crowd to go swimming in winter!”
In small communities — villages, towns — democracy can work. The PEOPLE KNOW each other personally, and the range of tasks corresponds to their level of understanding. Choosing a headman is not a choice of ideology, but a practical solution. Everyone knows: this one doesn’t drink and works, and that one is lazy and a chatterbox. But the scale of the state is different. And when it comes to a multi-million system, personal experience ceases to be a tool of choice. This means that NOT THE BEST managers pass through the sieve of popular elections, but the best actors. Those who know how to please, smile at the right time, wag a finger in a fatherly way, joke encouragingly, those who are closer to the people in form but not in content. The circle is closed: — The people have no knowledge. — Without knowledge there is no choice.
— Without choice there is no democracy. Why then does the West continue to insist that the people are the source of power? Why build legitimacy on something that is impossible even in theory. Let's imagine two enterprises. One has a permanent director; the other has a temporary director, elected every 4-6 months by all employees. And he CANNOT hold the position for more than two terms. That is, a maximum of 8-12 months, and the seat becomes vacant. All other things being equal, the first enterprise should be more efficient - with permanent management. But if the second suddenly shows better results, an obvious question arises: how is it? The answer is simple: all this is a trick. The real power at this second plant HAS NOT DISAPPEARED - it is just NOT PUBLIC. The visible turnover is a show. Management remains in the same hands. It is simply more profitable to hide real power behind the screen of "democracy". Maintaining proportions, we can say: changing the president every 4-6 years is the same as changing the general director every 4-6 months. In reality, such a system CANNOT be stable. If it remains, it means that behind the presidents there is an UNREPLACEABLE POWER, independent of votes. It is this that is the real power. This force DOES NOT PARTICIPATE in election shows, makes no promises, and does not flirt with the masses. The people do not even see it. And those whom it elects, it appoints as temporary managers. A change of surname in the presidential chair DOES NOT CHANGE the course. Both in the USA and in other countries, whoever wins the elections will be just a figurehead. The real owners remain behind the scenes. This model is similar to managing a ship. The owner of the ship is the elite. The captain is the president. And the people are the sailors. The sailors are allowed to choose the captain from the list proposed by the owner. After the vote, the new captain takes office - with a uniform, an office and speeches. But he has no REAL POWER. He is only an executor, acting within the interests of the ship owner. The sailors can be sure that the captain is in charge. He gives orders, stands on the bridge. But the STRATEGIC COURSE is not set by him. He is not the source of power, but its representative. The course is set by transnational political and economic clans that control resources, information, technology, and finance. Their power DOES NOT DEPEND on elections. They are not elected — they are not even discussed. They are the invisible architecture of the modern world.
Why is this power hiding? Why does it not declare itself openly? The answer is in stability. A regime built on coercion is unstable. It can only be maintained by force, and as Talleyrand said, one cannot sit on a bayonet. To understand this, let us return to the religious era. Then the world was arranged vertically: as in heaven there is God, archangels, and angels, so on the earth there is the tsar, nobles, and peasants. The power came from God. It DID NOT NEED any explanation — it was sacred. The Church explained to the poor and subjects that their suffering was pleasing to God, and humility brought them closer to Paradise. The nobles and clergy were the chosen ones. Their superiority was a given. Commoners DID NOT ASK questions: this is how it is; it will not be any other way. The central element of this structure was the idea of God. It put everything together: hierarchy, order, harmony. But with the development of science, it became clear: the picture of the world can be explained without God. And everything went down the drain. Titles turned into empty sounds. The Emperor is simply the commander-in-chief. The Count is an official. The Duke is an administrator. Their wives are "generals' wives", and their children are "generals' children". The sacred aura disappeared - and with it - the legitimacy. It turned out that superiority is nothing more than an inherited myth. The people began to ask questions:
- Why are some superior to others by birth?
- Why is origin more important than intelligence and talent?
- Why do the majority starve, while the minority is paid in gold?
Previously, religion answered these questions - BUT NOW - NOBODY. The old elite have lost its foundation. The situation has become fragile - like in North Korea, where power is passed on by blood, but without religion, without sacred support. There is only one thing left - the bayonet. Complete control over information and power. But such a system is unstable: if information breaks through, everything collapses. That is why the modern elite are looking for a new form of legitimacy. The bayonet is a temporary solution. Appeals to the reason of the masses DO NOT WORK. As Orwell wrote: "You can give the masses intellectual freedom - because they have no intelligence." And now a solution has been found: democracy - a new religion.
Instead of God - the people, instead of a priest - a candidate, instead of commandments - slogans. As the church once said: "it is not necessary to understand dogmas - the main thing is to be a believer", so democracy says: "it is not necessary to understand the system - the main thing is to have a pure heart". THE MAIN THING IS TO BELIEVE. And who to choose, television, sociologists, bloggers will tell you. This is a new sacredness. The old elite can no longer say "we are from God". But they can say: "we are the voice of the people". And while the people are in an ideological vacuum, this formula works. Whoever wins the elections - HE IS TEMPORARY. And the structure is eternal. But everything changes if a new Idea appears - Neither populism, nor a slogan, but a real, organizing, MEANING-CREATING IDEA. And if it begins to capture minds – the power inevitably flows to it. There WILL BE NO place left for the old elite - just as there was no place left for the feudal lords in the era of the bourgeoisie. The atmosphere will change — and with it - the flora and fauna. So the type of domination will change: instead of the consumer elite, an IDEOLOGICAL ELITE will come, instead of imitation of choice — choice by meaning, instead of a spectacle — movement. And victory in elections will depend not on the manipulation, but on the compliance with the Idea, as before — on the compliance with the religious dogma. And then everything will begin to change, not instantly — but irreversibly - which, in fact, can already be observed in its original manifestation.
The trap
What kind of power must be gained in order to realize the great goal? Usually people do not dwell on this question — it seems that the answer lies on the surface: the STATE POWER. Whatever the strategy, it does not work without resources. And the main resources are institutions, money, and influence. Therefore, POWER IS NEEDED - but how to get it? All possible ways come down to two strategies: force and parliamentary. Some are sure that elections are illusory, and real changes are possible only through an uprising. Others believe that an armed conflict is impossible, and victory can only be achieved through street mobilization, elections, and referendums.
The first group claims that the power NEVER GIVES UP voluntarily. If a candidate threatens the system, he will not be allowed to participate in the elections or will be declared an extremist. Constitutions can guarantee access, but in reality, everything is 100% predictable. The second group assures that in the digital age, the main force is mass opinion. If the majority wants change, the government will be forced to retreat. And they refer to the countries where democratic norms work. BOTH CONCEPTS are disabled in today's world.
Let's start with the force option. Its basis is conspiracy. But in the modern world, conspiracy is impossible. Everyone carries a tracking device with them - a Smartphone with a microphone and a camera. It records their voice, movement, and location. Algorithms analyze what you said, what you looked at, where you went, who you contacted. The face that got into the lens is instantly matched with the databases.
You may think of yourself as "Elusive Joe", but once you start acting, you instantly fall into the spotlight. As long as you are harmless, you are invisible. But as soon as you become significant, your anonymity disappears. Okay, let's say that the ARMED WAY is impossible. There remains the parliamentary one. But then let's remember Catalonia, 2017. More than 90% of the voters spoke out for independence. It would seem that democracy has triumphed. The people have expressed their will. But...
Madrid declared the referendum illegal. Why? - Because it WAS NOT allowed "in accordance with the established procedure". From the point of view of the state, the will of the people is a rebellion if it is NOT AGREEING with the law. And the punishment for the rebellion is up to 30 years in prison. The powerful always call events as it suits them. They have the army, police, and courts. Citizens have only an opinion. And if the opinion is different from the interests of the authorities, it is DECLARED A CRIME. Catalonia, Syria, Crimea, Libya - it's the same everywhere. Where it is advantageous, 0.1% of the population is considered bearers of democracy. Where it is disadvantageous, 95% of votes are declared a farce. Where the powerful need it, voting is legal. Where it interferes, it is criminal. The formula is simple: democracy is NOT the OPINION of the majority, but the opinion of the one who has power. The people are NOT A SUBJECT. They are a stage, decoration, electoral resource. They can participate in the performance, but DO NOT WRITE the script. From all of the above it follows: in the modern system it is impossible to take power either by force or by elections. This means that a third way is needed - a new one- but which one? Before looking for an answer, you need to remind yourself: the power is NOT AN END IN ITSELF. It is just a tool. It is needed not for the sake of chairs, money and status, but for the sake of realizing the goal - VICTORY OVER DEATH. Everything else is secondary. But then the next, more pressing question arises: why HAS NOT a single ideological movement in history BEEN ABLE to realize its dream, even having come to power? The answer is in the mechanics of power itself. All ideological groups, having reached the resource, began to spend their efforts not on realizing their ideal, but ON RETAINING THE POWER. They faced external threats, internal struggle, economics, and social demands. The idea retreated into the background. Without this – the power was lost. With this - THE IDEA DISAPPEARED. The state, like a spider, digests any force that enters it. It eats up all incoming resources, including enthusiasm. Everything that enters the mechanism works for the mechanism. And as a result: it is NOT THE ORGANIZATION that uses the state, but the state that uses the organization. All ideological movements without exception, having reached the throne, turned into administrators. They lost the goal. They lost the path. They lost themselves. The state power is a trap, a snare. It lures with the prospect of the resource, but in return requires the renunciation of the essence. And if for the sake of these powers you have to forget about the goal, then the game is lost at the moment of victory. NO ONE in history HAS BEEN ABLE to gain power and use it exclusively for the idea. The main conclusion follows from this: focusing on the seizure of the power is a strategic mistake. The state is not something that needs to be overcome. It is SOMETHING that needs TO BE PAST. Not to try to reform it, not to integrate, not to subordinate - but to go beyond its limits. As Nietzsche said: "Where the state ends - there look, my brothers."
Appearance
We do not need the power immersed in the struggle for budgets, tariffs and posts. We need the power free from routine. The one that is capable of thinking as a whole, seeing the horizon, WITHOUT DROWNING in the daily routine. The historical analogue is the papal power in Europe in the 11th-13th centuries. Then the Pope did not control armies and markets, but his word decided the fate of empires. He WAS NOT a part of the political process - he was ABOVE IT.
I am writing these lines and knew that today, April 21, 2025, Pope Francis passed away. Many people have forgotten that when he became Pope, instead of the golden Fisherman Ring (the Papal Ring reminds us that the Pope is the successor of the Apostle Peter, the first Pope, who was a fisherman by occupation), he put on the ring specially made for him - MADE OF SILVER and for the first time in the history of the papacy - he began his greeting in the RUSSIAN LANGUAGE - thus emphasizing the priorities of the new Control System. Everything happens publicly and privately. But NO ONE CAN stop the processes that have already been launched.
This means that we need a special type of political structure - The Power that DOES NOT ADMINISTRATE, but forms the direction. For this, an image is necessary - A holistic model. Without it, neither strategy nor tactics are possible. Without an image, there is no vector. To imagine such a system, let us return to the metaphor of a world-room. Inside it are air balloons-the states filled with heavy gas. They are material, and therefore CANNOT leave the room. Their interests are limited by the walls - the struggle for space, influence, resources. And above them is another ball. It is not material, it is impossible to pierce or collapse it. It is like a hologram - glowing, hovering. THIS IS AN IDEA. It is impossible to destroy it directly - only if you destroy the source of the projection. This immaterial ball emits two types of light. One is smooth, filling the entire room: it reminds that THE SUPREME GOAL of a mortal being is OVERCOMING DEATH. The second is a focused, mobile beam. Where it falls, the pressure in the balls changes. The political picture of the world changes NOT BY ORDER, but by influence. Now let's imagine that all the countries in the room are democratic, and all the people are as convinced as the believers were in the Middle Ages. Each person is a citizen of his state and at the same time a citizen of a supranational structure, a new type of "Church". And this Church has an earthly representation - a special state, like the Vatican. The Idea lives in it. Its task is NOT TO RULE, but to direct.
This structure does not interfere in the economy or politics directly. It does not give instructions - it GIVES MEANING. And just as in the Middle Ages people considered any authority confirmed by the Church to be legitimate, so here: THE LEGITIMACY OF THE AUTHORITY is determined by its correspondence to the Idea.
All elections are transparent. Candidates are not selected manually - they are registered without the participation of the officials. Voting takes place through digital currency: PERSONAL PAYMENT is your vote. No falsifications. The technology has been brought to almost absolute purity. But even in an ideal procedure, the main thing is not the technology, but the AUTHORITY OF THE CENTER. Like in Iran: formally - democracy. In fact, power belongs to spiritual leaders. No one will become president without their approval. Not approved - not registered. Approved - victory is guaranteed. Moreover, spiritual leaders have the right not only to remove the president, but also to punish him - up to corporal. This is not a metaphor - this is an article of the law. If all of humanity believed in Islam the way the Shiites believe, Iran would become the spiritual center of the world. Its task would only be to support the idea, and not fight for fuel, borders and GDP growth. But the world is NOT A SINGLE organism. It is a collection of conflicting interests. That is why the Iranian system works only within one state, and not over all. For the system on the scale of the Idea to work, a center is needed that will be trusted not by the faith, but by the meaning. Not by origin, but by the depth of the idea. It will not cancel elections, it will not cancel states. It will rise above them - like a holographic ball above the material. In such a system, elections will remain - but their logic will change. The winner will not be the one who adapts best to the expectations of the masses, but the one who is closer to the Idea. Today - they adapt to the tastes of the electorate. Tomorrow - they will ADAPT TO THE IDEA because it will be the source of legitimacy. And then the world will have not the center of power - but the CENTER OF THE MEANING. Its word will not command - but will direct. And this will be enough to change everything.
The Vector
The minimum task is to create the Idea translator - a real ideological center - not a state in the usual sense of meaning, not a corporation and not a movement. Rather, it is a symbiosis of the Vatican and Silicon Valley, protected by the state capable of ensuring autonomy and security.
Like the Vatican, such a center will be free from political and economic routine. It WILL NOT participate in wars, the market struggles or the production of goods. Its mission is not to rule, but to CONVEY THE MEANING. If the Catholic Church corresponded to the level of modernity, it would have embraced the entire world long ago. But its message is outdated. Old religions and mystical schools are OUT OF TIME. The Idea is needed that corresponds to the era.
A new type of ideological center will attract people with a philosophical, scientific, engineering mindset -people tired of routine and meaninglessness. Having political independence will allow them to create their own laws NOT BASED on the dogmas of the past. Space will open up for experiments that were impossible in the old system. This will become a natural magnet for free minds. This is still just a dream, which may well become the reality of today. But it is not only freedom that is important. The atmosphere of serving, not hiring is important. Work is a function. If you are paid, you do it. If you are not paid, you leave. Serving is when a person is driven NOT BY AN EXTERNAL stimulus, but by an internal meaning. An example of serving is a monk. An example of work is an office manager. You cannot say “he works as a monk” — that is nonsense. In the same way, you cannot say “he serves as a manager”. Serving is maximum energy. It was this energy that allowed the creation of nuclear weapons in a matter of years. Then physicists, mathematicians and engineers DID NOT WORK for money — they served the Idea. The same force is necessary now. A business model is not suitable for this.
The ultimate goal is for a supranational center to arise over all countries - like an immaterial ball of light over the ball-states. But this ball does not rule. It shines. The new world is not the world of a new form. It is the world of a new meaning.
I will not go into detail about what the future will look like. IT IS NOT NECESSARY. Outwardly, for a certain time, everything will remain the same: the same states, the same elections, the same officials. But a SINGULARITY POINT will appear — the Center that speaks not of eternity, but of immortality, not of faith, but of Knowledge, not of dogma, but of the goal that is understandable to every mortal.
We do not need to strive for a single state "Earth". This is a dead end. Just as geese are led by a goose, not a crane, so each culture can only be led by its own representative. DIVERSITY IS NECESSARY. And there will be conflicts between states. Let states live by their own laws. But above them — there must be light - a point free from routine, a center to which one can raise one's eyes. It is impossible to get rid of routine completely. Monitoring, adjustments, interventions — all these are inevitable. For now — this will be the function of the IDEOLOGICAL STRUCTURE. But even in this case, the staff turnover will be on an ideological scale, not an administrative one. And this is the key difference.
NO TASK in the world IS ACCOMPLISHED because of the lack of money. All real obstacles are THE LACK OF IDEAS. And there are few ideas because the thinking of the majority is bound by chains of "obvious" truths - eternal, immutable, sacred. The mind CANNOT break out beyond the boundaries of the permissible, and the new is always BEYOND THE OLD. What is inside the system is an upgrade. A real discovery is always outside. The goal that can be clearly formulated is already achievable. If you can consciously say: "OVERCOMING DEATH" - it means that humanity has the potential for this. But it will not be realized until there are two conditions:
1. Concentration of resources.
2. Freedom of thought.
All fundamental revolutions in science — from Copernicus to Einstein — happened not because of money, but because of the ABILITY TO GO beyond dogma. Those who think strictly along the rails are not researchers, but driverless locomotives, mechanisms, repeaters. If you think within the framework of the absolute concepts of good and evil, "true" morality, "eternal" norms — then our CONVERSATION IS IMPOSSIBLE. The wall between us is not ideological, but ontological. Constrained thinking CANNOT accept either a new idea, or generate its own. It reacts to everything unfamiliar, like immunity to a foreign protein — with rejection.
Once the mind could not imagine that the Earth was not the center of the Universe. Today, the dogma that death is final, that the personality is inseparable from the body, and that reality is exclusively material has become a conviction. The ideas about life extension, personality transfer, going beyond the body seem absurd not because they are false, but because consciousness is bound by the dogma. Bound thinking DOES NOT SEEK the truth. It protects its limits. We DO NOT KNOW what life, personality, reality are. But ignorance MUST NOT stop. A bound mind is afraid of darkness. A free mind enters it with fire. I am sure there is no absolute freedom. Thinking is limited by the current capabilities of our brain, instincts, culture, and fantasy. But to realize the boundaries is already a step towards their expansion. Instincts and morality CAN BE OVERCOME. You cannot go beyond the only limit of possible imagination. Fantasy is the final frontier. We are like a balloon that we inflate from the inside. No matter how far we stretch it, we are still inside. Freedom is not an absolute. It is the length of the leash on which the mind can escape from the cage. The longer it is, the higher the potential. And the worst thing is not that the mind is bound, but that it is NOT AWARE of it. The more a person acts according to a pattern, the freer he feels. The more he thinks independently, the more he feels the boundaries. He who is NOT AWARE of the disease will not treat it. He who does not see his lack of freedom DOES NOT SEEK liberation.
The first step to freedom is to see its absence, to understand that most of the goals we strive for are NOT OURS. They are implanted through culture, media, and upbringing. We just rationalize the instilled impulses, using the mind as a tool for fulfilling someone else's will, because all of this has been imputed to us for the last two thousand years. And of course, the hardest thing is to doubt what HAS ALWAYS BEEN CONSIDERED sacred. Yesterday it was religion. Today - humanism, science, liberal values. Tomorrow - something new. The essence is one: sacred truths change, but the attitude towards them does not. Le Bon wrote that for centuries people believed in monstrous legends. Even the greatest minds - Galileo, Newton - did not question them not because they were stupid, but because they LIVED INSIDE the general hypnosis. Superstitions were the norm. Doubt was a crime. Today, NOTHING HAS CHANGED. Only the legends have been replaced by other legends. But, as before, any doubt causes not interest, but irritation. Just as they burned witches then, today they burn doubters - morally, reputationally, and socially. And the strength of dogma is not in its truth but in the fact that it corresponds to the CURRENT LEVEL of development. When the growth outgrows dogma - it becomes an enemy. And everything that was sacred - begins to restrain. That is why to think means to go out - not into denial, but into new possibility. And that is why the humanity potential is not in the resources, but in the liberation of thinking.
IN total
When a person first encounters the topic of overcoming death, his first thought is: this is a task for scientists. Genetics, biology, neurotechnology — these are the ones who should solve something. Many look at themselves, understand that they HAVE NO relation to science, and step aside. They are waiting. They are waiting, like at the station — for the “train of immortality” to arrive. And UNTIL it ARRIVES, they fill their time with whatever comes to hand: entertainment, everyday life, and career - all the same, we are “out of business.” But this is a mistake - overcoming death DOES NOT BEGIN with the laboratory. It begins with creating conditions for science. We will not be saved by knowledge while science sits in a cage. And it sits — in a cage of politics, economics, distorted goals and fear. And there is no need to integrate into the system. You need to build your own. The hardest thing is TO BRING A PERSON OUT OF mental sleep, to convey to him: we are all on a sinking ship. And while everyone is running after things, money and careers, the water is rising. Even if there is no way out, it is BETTER TO SEARCH than to wait.
The world needs a center. Not a state. Not an army. Not another party – but the center CAPABLE OF THINKING on the scale of the Planet and in the time of life.
Climate change, resources, waste, technological chaos - all this goes beyond the boundaries of one government. And the authorities think in terms of 4-6 years. They have no time for the horizon. They are butterflies on the deck of the Titanic. While it is sinking, they flicker. We need a structure capable of looking beyond the horizon. Not to save the government, but to SAVE HUMANS. There is no need to replace the elite, because today there is no one to replace them with. First, we need to gather those who think differently. They will eventually become the real elite.
Even if you have accepted everything written above with your mind, your heart may NOT LET YOU IN. I have seen this many times. A person’s mind agrees - "Yes, it is logical." But this DOES NOT BECOME an action - because the heart is not turned on. And while it is silent, a person continues to live as before. Apostle Paul spoke about this two thousand years ago: "The good that I want, I do not do, but the evil that I do not want, I do." And so it will be. UNTIL the mind and the heart MERGE, you will know that you are going in the wrong direction - and still go. This is normal. This is the way a human is designed. This is the way the transition within the New Control System is designed. This is the Path...
1 The Hayflick limit is a limit on the number of times somatic cells can divide, named after its discoverer Leonard Hayflick. In 1961, Hayflick observed that human cells dividing in cell culture die after about age 50 and show signs of aging as they approach this limit. If all the cells created per person before birth (and all the cells that make them) are multiplied by the average time it takes for cells to reach the end of their life, we get about 120 years. This is the ultimate Hayflick limit—the maximum number of years a human can live.
2 Alexander Mikhailovich Khatybov (real name Morozov) is a Russian researcher and theorist whose works cover a wide range of disciplines: from mathematics and physics to biology, medicine and celestial mechanics. He was born on February 9, 1945 in the city of Cherepanovo in the Novosibirsk region and graduated from the Bauman Moscow State Technical University in 1969. A. Khatybov became known for his developments in the field of psychotronic weapons, working together with Alexander Deev. After Deev's death, he founded the Ritm-Fund laboratory, where he was engaged in the development of the Theory of Branching Systems and other scientific works, such as Mathematics of Real Time Scale, Synergetics and Cold Plasma Fusion. These studies were related to the defense industry and were considered as the basis for the creation of new high-tech types of strategic weapons, His scientific interests included Mathematics, including the development of his own formulas and theories, such as the 18-axis symmetry theory. Physics, with an emphasis on unknown atomic structures and the golden section in the atom. Biology and medicine, exploring the principles of the existence of a living cell and the frequency balance of the human body. Celestial mechanics, including calculations and the development of special formulas. Khatybov also claimed that the Earth is under biological control, and his works included concepts related to the noosphere and the habitat. He passed away on March 19, 2011. A. Khatybov's works, despite their unconventional nature and lack of recognition in official science, continue to generate interest and discussion in various circles.