Feodor Shkrudnev

We live in an era when words have been devalued and meanings have crumbled into dust. People no longer read to understand — they read to agree or to object. They DO NOT DELVE INTO what they encounter — they filter everything through themselves, whatever that "self" may be. And so, truth, even when it stands nearby, BECOMES UNATTAINABLE. Not because it is hidden — rather because no one is prepared to perceive it. That is precisely why we need the first filter of Truth. Not as a barrier, rather AS A SETTING. As a protocol of Understanding, without which any knowledge turns into a weapon against oneself.

The world is rapidly entering a stage of irreversible change. The old order is collapsing, illusions are crumbling, and truth is being revealed. Russia, as one of the MAIN NODES of planetary history, has found itself at the center of this tectonic shift — not by chance, rather by a DEEP DESIGN to which it must either conform or vanish as a subject. Today, with the old governing system dismantled and a new one only beginning to take form, the key question is not simply survival, it is transition — transition to ANOTHER ONTOLOGY, to a different logic of power, to a new mind. The previous articles (“Brain Protocol…”) were devoted to the DIAGNOSIS OF COLLAPSE — the collapse of state structures, of the parasitic elite, of the erosion of subjectivity, and the loss of meaning. Now before us arises a task of greater complexity — transformation. This is NO LONGER EXPOSURE, it is a design. Not merely the destruction of the old, rather a sketch of a new architecture — the architecture of life, meaning, and will.

Perhaps, no problem has ever troubled humanity as deeply as the problem of death. No other question has pressed upon the very core of human fear and reason so insistently, so painfully, so inevitably. Man is the only being known to us who possesses the ability NOT SIMPLY to instinctively avoid death, but to consciously anticipate it, to see it as the finale, as the inexorable boundary. And possessing this knowledge, he does NOT SUBMIT, rather he rises against it. It is precisely here, in this point of inner resistance, that lies the TRAGIC ESSENCE of human nature — his rebellion against finitude, against the materialist axiom: “everything that has a beginning has an end.” This is not mere fear, it is a philosophically constructed confrontation between Reason and the laws of the material world that is not yet subject to it. Man REFUSES TO ACCEPT the absoluteness of death, and this despair, this unspoken inner “no,” has given rise to entire religions, mythologies, meanings.

What only recently seemed like fantasy is today becoming commonplace. And it is not about technology as such, rather about the accelerated reformatting of reality itself — informational, social, material, and, most importantly, human. More and more often we encounter NOT JUST changes, but signs of an accomplished transition into a completely different phase of being. And if we continue to look at what is happening through the eyes of the old world, we will GET NOTHING other than fear, confusion, and voluntary submission to the new “elites.” Because what was imposed by the old Control System — in the person of those who used to rule, manipulate, structure and enslave — has not disappeared.

Some dream of salvation, others of silence in their heads. The first receive religion, the second religion in convenient packaging: ready-made answers, sanctioned emotions, and a strict taboo on thought. Thinking is dangerous, understanding is harmful, doubting is criminal. Better to be like a dried roach: no pain, no anxiety, no doubts — pure, spiritually purified emptiness. Yet alas, civilizations are not eternal. Along with them collapse the formats of faith, their priests, and even the configurations of "eternal truths" are collapsing. Those who yesterday called themselves “servants of God” today suddenly turn into clients of spiritual markets. And everything would be fine, if not for one thing: DEATH HAS NOT BEEN CANCELED.

Every generation feels like it lives in a special time. Ours really does. But not because it has become smarter, but because it has finally been “allowed to know” a little more about what has been done to it for the last 18,000 years. And if someone still has the Brain in working condition, someone WILL HAVE TO USE it as intended: not to reproduce the programs, but to understand them. So that, perhaps for the first time in our entire history, Man becomes something more than just an executor in someone else’s system.

"Someday the will of the Russian people for divine perfection, for godlikeness will overcome the heavy gravity that returns us to the world of shadows and to disorders. Through the efforts of the creative people, Russia will attain that kind of resurrection, after which there comes immortality. This is what we talked about with President Putin in his Kremlin office. And in this office I heard the word "immortality" from him. It is the most Russian, most beautiful word, put into Russian lips by God Almighty himself." (Alexander Prokhanov)

If you ask Man whether he wants to die on his own free will or on someone else's will, hardly anyone in their right mind will choose the latter. Even those who believe in the afterlife and hope to find themselves in the promised paradise will agree: it is better to go there when you yourself have decided that the path has been completed, but not when someone or something - chance, illness, fate or another person - decide for you. Until that hour, the NATURAL CHOICE is life - purposeful, clear, fulfilled. Sometimes people, tired or falling into some philosophical exaltation, drop phrases about their readiness to die not of their own free will.

"Only a handful of thinking people need the truth, and the crowd must just "obey", but what to believe in - this is no longer of great importance. The main thing is that people obey. And what is presented to them in this case - this is actually secondary. The truth is dangerous. The world has always been based on lies... The main thing is that this lie is interesting enough for a “short-sighted minds” to follow it... And if in this case you begin to prove to the crowd the real truth, disproving their "faith" in God knows what, you will be torn to pieces by this same crowd". This was said in the middle of the sixteenth century. Is it acceptable now, in our time? The reader will answer this question on his own.

We are used to thinking that we live in the present — a narrow strip of time dividing the past from the future. However, the present is not a fleeting moment; it is a permeable fabric woven with the shadows of what has been and the projections of what may come. It is not confined to a frame, nor does it end with perception. The present is open: it flows through us, opening passageways to what has not yet happened, and to what has NOT GONE.

I have a dream. If I indulge in it dreaming on the sofa WITHOUT TAKING ANY STEPS to implement it - it is an idle fancy. Thomas More outlined his vision of an ideal society in the novel "Utopia", without saying a word about the way he was going to build this society. This means that Thomas More outlined NOT AN IDEA, but a fantasy, which is no different from Manilov's fantasies. He could imagine improvements, but all this remained just empty words and sweet dreams that do not come true.