Feodor Shkrudnev

We live in the time when Knowledge has become accessible, but it has not become any closer. It is open—in books, in online archives, in the tired eyes of those who have searched for it their entire lives. And yet, the closer it is, the further away from it are the vast majority of people. This strange game of hide- and-seek with the obvious is NOT THE RESULT of some evil or conspiracy. It is the reflection of the System itself—the one that changes the form, but NOT THE SUBSTANCE. Nowadays, it gives us everything, but only as much as we can accept. IT WILL NOT GIVE US MORE — and THERE IS NO POINT to give less.

There are things that cannot be expressed in words, but you can direct your attention to them. There is knowledge that cannot be "conveyed in words"—it can only be recognized if the inner "code" within you matches the depth from which it came. It is precisely about this kind of knowledge that I have tried to write.

We live in the time in which understanding—lost, forgotten, devalued— once again is becoming the MAIN INSTRUMENT of survival. But to understand the present, it is necessary to destroy the old patterns of perception, rebuild internal channels, thus revealing within ourselves the one who is truly capable of seeing, hearing, and distinguishing. Here there WILL BE NO familiar logic, no comforting formulas, and no ready-made answers. This article is like a mirror, but the mirror directed NOT OUTWARDS, but inward.

Is it possible to derive the meaning of life? Yes, it is, but only on one condition: if we proceed from the worldview in which being is thought of as the Single Whole. However, it is precisely here that we encounter a boundary as thin as the razor blade and as insurmountable as the abyss itself. Cognition ,by its very nature, is division. In order to understand something, it is necessary to isolate it from its context, to define its boundaries, to separate it from the rest. Only then can the mind “process” the object: to evaluate its properties, to measure, to classify, to organize. This is the way thinking works. This is the way something is born and we CALL IT UNDERSTANDING. But this mechanism does not work with the Whole.

Every genuine evolution is of destructive character. Not because it is basically aggressive, but because the new cannot be born in the womb of the old without tearing it apart. Just as capitalism could not grow out of the depths of the feudal system, so the idea of defeating death CANNOT take root within the framework of the existing world order. The systems that have reached the limit of their maturity become not the bearers of the future, but its MAIN OBSTACLE. In order to create something qualitatively new, the old must be dismantled to the ground, and not only as infrastructure or institution, but as logic, value, the very FOUNDATION OF THINKING. The construction of the future does not begin with building of the walls - it begins with clearing out the area from the dead weight of the past. For any attempt to fit a new idea into the old frames WILL NOT BRING us to either any renewal or breakthrough - it will only result in another modification of the old, an upgrade, and mimicry.

The modern era is not merely a moment in time — it is the point of total human saturation. Everything that has accumulated over the last 18,000 years in the human mode of being under external control — distorted forms of thought, perverted mechanisms of social organization, excessive passions, and parasitic structures — has now reached a critical density. This density is not physical, rather it is energetic-informational. It represents that very RESIDUAL LAYER, molded from functions which people performed not as individuals, but as operational elements within someone else's control system. Long epochs of interventional oversight shaped the human not toward unfolding and development, rather toward optimal suitability — suitability for the execution of imposed and thus deeply alien meanings.

Nowadays, modern Man lives in the time of extreme technology and information saturation - and at the same time - in the state of deep internal disorientation. He is surrounded with explanations, but does not understand the point of them; he is able to measure, but is not able to distinguish; he knows how the world works, but has lost the understanding of why he is in this world.

The beginning of the third millennium has raised questions before the civilization, the answers to which will determine the future of the Individual and Society. The landmarks of freedom, equality and fraternity, which once inspired the movement towards social justice, have now given rise to the other side - the post-industrial era of MASSIVE FLIGHT from responsibility.

If our achievements in science are not that great, then our understanding of science itself - its nature, its limits and meaning - is EVEN LESS. We are used to working in a narrow field of science and almost NEVER CONSIDER knowledge AS A WHOLE. We do not ask questions - we answer those already formulated. We DO NOT DESIGN - we implement. Nowadays we are builders, but NOT ARCHITECTS.

I wrote this article at the beginning of 2016. But in the events happening today, in my opinion, what was stated then is more relevant now. And so it should be. Then, we did NOT QUITE correctly understand the processes that were gaining strength and that brought us to the present times, having made us exactly what WE ARE now. I will add to what was written from the position of today, in my opinion, what is relevant today and explains a lot.

Nowadays we live in the society that has neither purpose, nor idea. And without them, any society is NOT JUST dying, it is becoming demoralized. I am sure that in such a situation, the best minds should focus not on discussing the ongoing, but on the reason that generates these events. If it drips from the ceiling, you have to fight with the hole in the roof, not with the puddle on the floor. Naturally, everyone will answer all the life questions put to him in one way or another. Whether he comprehends it or not is the second question. The main thing is that he will definitely live his life in one direction or another. If he chooses the direction himself, he is a Person.

Planes are crashing... People are dying... All platforms are trumpeting about odiousness and heroism in various conjectures and interpretations. The “mighty of this world” speak out, with their explanations aggravating the confusion in understanding the ongoing, but for some reason no one asks the question - why is this happening? What is the basis of all this? Why do people behave the way they do and not otherwise and do not even think about it? There are many who have VERY CONTRADICTORY feelings, most often critical, and they have more than enough reasons, but there is NO EXPLANATION why exactly this way and not otherwise, not superficial explanations, but those based on one’s own knowledge, which is impossible without the true information.

In something you like, you exaggerate the pros and downplay the cons. And, on the contrary, you exaggerate the cons and downplay the pluses if you do not like something.

It is impossible to convince a person of what he SUBCONSCIOUSLY DENIES. This applies even to science. As Max Planck said, science develops from funeral to funeral. The bearers of the old do not give way to the new, not because they see some faults, but because they do not like it.

For more than thirty years, we have been creating certain societies, focusing on certain ideas that provoke more and more amazement over the years. But after all, no one removes them from the agenda. The idea of rebuilding the world seems to most people to be an EMPTY FANTASY, not because they consider the goal unworthy or see logical errors, but because the scale confuses them. So an ant — it will take the matter seriously only within the framework of its anthill. It WILL NOT COME UP with the idea of activities outside its home. The same way people evaluate the ongoing today with domestic, commercial ... maximum — political benefits (which is the same commerce).

Our consciousness creates the world. The old consciousness lives in the old world. The new consciousness manifests a new world. It is an axiom.

It seems to me wrong to consider any questions of our life, of our existence as such outside of the current events. For some reason, all comparisons are lame, but this does not mean that we do not compare anything or all the comparisons are meaningless.

In March 2015, I wrote this article, when everything ongoing today was “gaining momentum”, like the train departing from the platform to rush across the expanses of our Russia. A lot of time has passed - by our human standards, but for the Universe it is less than a moment. I made up my mind to remind you about this article, supplementing it with information that, in my opinion, is more than relevant today, remembering the Russian proverb - "Revision is the mother of learning.

Is there any way to cognize our being as a single Whole? But the Whole is uncognizable, for cognition is the separation of the cognizable object from the rest of the world and then studying the characteristics. It is not important what you want to understand - neutrino or a butterfly, music or galaxy, a house or a stone, people or politics. It is important that as long as the object of cognition is NOT SEPARATED from the rest, its boundaries are NEITHER CLEAR NOR OUTLINED, it is impossible to understand it. The mind operates only with magnitudes. This means understanding.

All of us are really eager to "have a look" at least into the near future, so that we could understand the principle of the social model’s functioning unfolded there. And, in general, what is going to be unfolded there, in the future? But to see that it is necessary once again to return to the study of the modern human "material" nature. One of the main qualities of the “human material” today is that THIS MATERIAL has small scale thinking and exorbitant ambitions. The great people of antiquity recognized certain authorities (priests, philosophers, thinkers, God...).

Today we live in the society that has neither purpose, nor idea. And without them, any society not only dies, it gets rotten alive, which many have already seen, as they say, in reality. In such a situation, the best minds should focus not on the discussing the ongoing events, but on the reason that generates them. If it drips from the ceiling, you should fight with the hole in the roof, not with the puddle on the floor. Naturally, everyone will somehow answer all the questions put to one, the number of which is growing every day. SENSIBLY OR NOT SENSIBLY – it is the second question.

It is impossible to shake Man’s confidence in his rightness at the level of the subconscious. At the moment, I am sure it is not only waste of time and effort, but also harmful for the understanding of something and especially the ongoing events. You will not prove anything trying to prove to someone who DOES NOT WANT to listen to anything new and unusual for oneself. But you cannot leave people without the information that you own yourself.

Lots of people are full of determination. They are like a rocket ready to launch, from under which clouds of smoke and fire fly out. The man-rocket is roaring, shouting to the whole world that he will achieve, make progress, break through... But then something comical happens to such a man-rocket... He takes off and flies along a strange trajectory: in zigzags, to and fro, erratically. As a result, he either collides with a similar rocket or hits the ground. In both cases, such a man-rocket crashes. And all this happens because he has NO GOAL.

We are happy only when anticipating the change, - that is the way life works. The changes themselves mean nothing to us; they have just happened, and we are already hungry for new ones. We were told that there had been changes somewhere. This is evidenced by disturbances in the spectra of all celestial bodies–say those who believe that they understand celestial bodies and their spectra. The changes may be kind. They may turn out to be bad. They may also be neutral. WE DON'T KNOW.

To protect yourselves from danger, we need to understand the source of the danger. This will allow us to see the nature of the source and understand its purpose. Then we will be able to understand the plan and means of implementation, create a defense line, strategy and tactics. All this is possible, IF the source of danger IS CLEAR to us.

We are used to believing that the main function of the brain is thinking. We often hear that "we need brains in order to thin..." For all that, the idea that "the reality we observe is the product of our brain and depends on our thinking" has been very popular lately. Is it the truth? Man is the only creature with a developed brain.

Throughout time people have tried to grasp the reality, to make all pieces fall into the right place and comprehend it by asking themselves questions. After all, when there is a question, there is a chance to find an answer. When there is no question, there is no chance to find an answer either. Even nowadays, our logic and reason MAKE UP THEIR ASSERTIONS, starting from axioms – the truths taken for granted, because of their "obviousness".

The collapse of the thinking foundation means that Man is locked in the closet of everyday realities. This can be compared to the Newton physics. It's perfect for the pressing matters. The calculations that build bridges, create cars, and sew boots are all based on the Newton mechanics. But this mechanic, by its nature, does not allow you to go up or down to another level. It puts the limit to knowledge.

There are no problems in the world which solution could be halted due to the lack of money. Everybody does not move because of the lack of ideas. The reason is that the mind is bound by the total, elementary, eternal and obvious truths. It cannot make a step beyond the lines outlined by them, while the new is always beyond the lines of the known. Everything within the lines, at best, is an upgrade of the old truths, but not new at all.

The larger the scale of the subject being brought up and the deeper it is, the more vigorously people defend the truths they are accustomed to. Few people can bare criticism of their elementary truths. No wonder Descartes said that the main obstacle on the way to new views and knowledge is OUR ABC TRUTHS. In the things you like, you will exaggerate the pros and downplay the cons. In the things you don’t like, on the contrary, you will exaggerate the minuses, and downplay the pluses.

What is power? Where did this construction to control people come from? And why has it been used? What does it look like? And why? Imagine two companies. One company has a permanent director; the other company has a temporary director, for 4-5-6 months, the working collective through all-working elections (similar to popular elections) makes decisions. He cannot hold the director's chair for more than two terms; maximum, after 8-10-12 months the director has to leave the office. Other things being equal, the first company should be more efficient than the second one.

The political society composition within the framework of the “Development of the Brain Genotypes” program was built on the rigid psychological specialization of the particular community of people. Each community executed only the imposed on it function in the political processes within the framework of the Old Control Program and in the specifics of building social structures of the control or distribution of benefits through some form of ownership.

It is not power that spoils people, but fear. Those who have power are spoiled by the fear of losing it, and those who submit to power are spoiled by the fear of power.

Nowadays we, people, are dealing with a new reality, regarding which we have to make coordinated decisions. To make it clear what we are talking about, it is advisable to recollect some of the trivial axioms of “working with a patient”, set out in a systemic way, because these well-known axioms in the years to come may be replaced by others, which are UNACCEPTABLE for the entire community of people TODAY. Which ones? I will try to discuss the subject of people’s future from the standpoint of my understanding of the ongoing and my life experience both in politics and in psychology, and in the so-called political science, which has replaced philosophy. Therefore, the text may contain thoughts that are unusual and even unexpected for some readers, especially for those who are not yet familiar with series 369 of articles.

The current civilization is a huge canvas called “The Blind Lead the Blind”. We consider ourselves deeply civilized, highly spiritual and developed in all respects. We are proud of our achievements in the arts and sciences. But in reality we are cavemen, modernly dressed, and sprinkled with fashionable cologne. Our neighbors on the planet are our enemies. And like a prehistoric tribe, we boldly beat ourselves with our fives in the patriotic chest, brandishing a nuclear club and terrifying the enemy with the indomitable force of our fists, living in the world we have created, where funeral is more important than the deceased, where wedding is more significant than love, where appearance is more important than the mind. We live in the culture of packaging that despises content...

On the night of October 25, 2021, a very difficult barrier event of the transition period for the accomplishment of a great number of events is going to take place, which will come true in the future.

So what are we all to do? Here, we are improving, improving, becoming better, smarter, kinder, but what a pleasure it is when someone makes a decision for you. The she-wolf says to her cubs: “Bite like me”, and that's enough, and she-hare teaches the bunnies: “Run away like me”, and this is also enough, but a person needs someone’s advice — what he should do today, in this, absolutely UNCLEAR situation for all of us, the events that do not lend themselves to our comprehension, the changes in nature, which neither the Hydrometeocenter nor the gray-haired "academicians" arc able to explain.

It had never occurred to the majority of people that they would have been witnessing such changes in Man in their lifetime. It looks like their childhood passed in one world, and they live out their lives in quite a different world of different people. Therefore, the posthuman¹ for them is NOT AN IDLE question, but a completely real problem of “relocation” from the comfortable world of their parents to the world of different people, getting used to them, living among them.

The present civilization is like a great canvas called “The Blind Lead the Blind”. We think of ourselves as profoundly civilized, highly spiritual and developed in all respects. We are proud of our achievements in the arts and sciences. But in reality we are barbarians, dressed in modern clothes and sprinkled with fashionable cologne. Our neighbors on the planet are our enemies.

How could we imagine our future? To make it easier for understanding, about which the reader would ask, let us imagine the future world order as a field on which cows are grazing under the supervision of a shepherd. The field is our planet. The cows are the states. The shepherd is an external power.

“If you are not interested in politics that does not mean that politics is not interested in you”. This quote, which for some reason people like to attribute to Bismarck, actually belongs to another — the Athenian Pericles. Bismarck paraphrased it this way: “If you do not care about politics, then politics will take care of you”. Therefore, as I have promised, — we turn to politics. The current politics and where it will bring us to if we DO NOT GRASP the reality in the ongoing.

he point of the goals is not in the concept, but IN THE BEING ITSELF, which for our vision is not different from non-being and is not reduced to the potential existence of the goal in the mind. In the end, the phenomena of expediency have, as it seems, the form of existence that is eternally real. They are hidden from us precisely by their eternal reality.